Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

ninjadude93 t1_jappg4j wrote

Its getting downvoted because you've made what seems like a poor attempt to imply buttigieg is also a pedo by association and I assume the intent is to slander all democrats as well. Whatever the case its irrelvant to the issue so you're getting downvoted

79

TriclopeanWrath t1_jaqqt9g wrote

"Pedophile had close relationship with prominent politician!"

Newsworthy.

"Pedophile had close relationship with prominent Democrat!"

SLIDE SLIDE SLIDE

−52

ninjadude93 t1_jar34tu wrote

Whatever, you asked why you were getting downvoted either in bad faith or because you can't self reflect on your own actions lol

17

TriclopeanWrath t1_jarmj5y wrote

My action was pointing out the political connections of a child pornographer. If he was Republican affiliated, would your reaction be the same?

−16

ninjadude93 t1_jarvtmc wrote

Yeah if he was republican affiliated I still dont think it would matter to this discussion. Theres plenty of examples of sexual abuse from people in power regardless of political leaning seems to be a common theme among the ultra rich

5

whynotjoin t1_jarseo9 wrote

“Politician was close to another politician” just isn’t as salacious huh?

That seems like a far more likely connection point. Bet you could dig up all sorts of Republican arrestees associated with prominent national Republican politicians. But that’s never been newsworthy either.

16

walkandtalkk t1_jark0ur wrote

It's not really newsworthy.

Could you link to your post about former House Speaker Dennis Hastert (Republican) recently being convicted of child molestation, or of any of his associations with current Republican lawmakers?

6

TriclopeanWrath t1_jarm4y7 wrote

No, because I didn't make one. If I go back far enough into my post history, though, I can find posts about the Republican call-boy White house scandal, (repuplican) Lawrence Kings Savings and loan scandal, Roy Cohn's special relationship with Trump, etc...

Should I stick to ONLY pointing out Republican-afffiliated pedos, and avoid the Democrat-affiliated ones? Would that make you happy?

0

oh-propagandhi t1_jasq1ty wrote

You seem to miss the point. If a guy who works with you, whom you go out for beer and wings with, turns out to be a pedophile, that shouldn't reflect on you at all should it?

3

TriclopeanWrath t1_jax4s9m wrote

If I had a very high level security clearance it most certainly would

0

oh-propagandhi t1_jayycef wrote

1.3 million people have top secret clearance. There's statistically some creeps in that pool.

2