Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

phoenix1984 t1_jdmwuv3 wrote

Reply to comment by VaccumSaturdays in Xcel Energy to power down Monticello nuclear plant early after more radioactive water leaks out by VaccumSaturdays

Because after actually dangerous accidents rushed regulation was passed saying any leak must be cleaned up regardless of how dangerous it is. Remember the coal power plant example? This is not like the Ohio train derailment.

It is tritium. Its radiation cannot pass through the skin. If ingested, it decays within a few hours. You know the radioactive material doctors use to photograph the path your veins take? Thousands of times more radioactive. Hell, assuming they never clean it up and you live next door and consume the entire leak yourself, that would be somewhere between an X-ray and an international flight’s worth of radiation. Those exit signs they hang in schools all over the place? Waaay more tritium than this. You absolutely consume way more radiation naturally.

You are proving my point. People don’t understand the relative dangers of different radiation levels.

1

VaccumSaturdays OP t1_jdn3r3c wrote

You keep insinuating that this is a very low level of concern, but you’re proving my point. The concern is not what we’ve been informed of, but what we haven’t been informed of. What comes next.

I’ll summarize it this way, you don’t give a shit. And that’s fine. But most others do, and are waiting for the other shoe to drop.

So again, your damage control is showing.

0

phoenix1984 t1_jdn5iid wrote

So you’re concerned that a thing that hasn’t happened yet, in a reactor that is already in the process of being shut down, will happen. Ok, probably not first place of concern but a degree of paranoia when it comes to nuclear safety is a good thing. Yay for good intentions. Sounding the alarm over things that don’t matter hurts your ability to keep people safe.

If something bad does happen, but if you’ve been overreacting about the things that don’t matter, nobody will listen/care. It hurts not only your own credibility but people’s impression of the dangers of radiation in general. If you are legit worried about nuclear safety, then clearly communicating accurate information is priority #1. This post and your comments until now do none of that. They make the people who believe you less safe. You are doing harm. That’s why I’m hung up on this.

1

VaccumSaturdays OP t1_jdnlp1n wrote

The definition is “gaslighting” ☝️

0

phoenix1984 t1_jdntkw4 wrote

Another great example is calling anything you disagree with gaslighting. It destroys the meaning and hurts people’s ability to accurately call it out when it actually happens.

1

VaccumSaturdays OP t1_jdoro25 wrote

A classic case of Double Gaslighting ☝️

1

phoenix1984 t1_jdorwxo wrote

Next up, triple secret gaslighting! So you’re just done saying anything relevant or substantive now then, huh?

[edit]

So you're going to scare people who don't know any better, and then block anyone who calls you out on it. Preying on people's ignorance and fears for karma. Cool.

−1

VaccumSaturdays OP t1_jdosf0y wrote

Remember earlier when I said you don’t give a shit, but others do? Bye, bye.

1