Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

[deleted] t1_j9xdffc wrote

3

Big_D_Cyrus t1_j9xdjsd wrote

You know are on the wrong side when you are attacking education

2

[deleted] t1_j9xdky3 wrote

[removed]

2

Big_D_Cyrus t1_j9xe179 wrote

Says the person who came at me with, "but it wouldn't have prevented this." You attacked me for wanting people to be educated about guns. Never wrote that it would have prevented this . But you clearly read what you want

1

jfjacobc t1_j9xjgco wrote

You make good points man, you're probably right in saying training and certification wouldn't have prevented this shooting. Maybe if she had her own gun, she could have protected herself. Maybe she still would have died. We'll never know.

My point is, there is no law that could have saved her life, so we shouldn't let perfect be the enemy of progress, and I think mandatory training for potential gun owners is progress.

2

[deleted] t1_j9xnj7h wrote

[removed]

1

jfjacobc t1_j9xtxsi wrote

Not going to lie, I didn't read the article. That was pretty much my point though, some situations are just un-legislatable. However irrelevant to this particular incident training may have been, it would still be a net benefit to a gun-laden society like ours. I was just using this article as an excuse to open dialogue on the topic is all.

1