Submitted by a_dogs_mother t3_10w0it0 in news
linderlady t1_j7srn4x wrote
Reply to comment by PedanticWookiee in Father of 2 missing children allegedly abducted by their mom speaks out by a_dogs_mother
Thanks for the info! That's wild. So they can run your plates to get your identity without cause, but if they stop you on foot for something they need to suspect you if a crime to require you to provide ID? That seems weird.
PedanticWookiee t1_j7su9wb wrote
Driving is a regulated activity. You require a license, vehicle registration, and (most places) insurance. The police have broad powers that are meant to enable them to make sure drivers are operating their vehicles within the bounds of the many laws and regulations that govern the operation of motor vehicles. Checking up on these things will also reveal any outstanding warrants for the registered owner. If you're on foot, you are not participating in a regulated activity, and most jurisdictions do not require you to identify yourself unless the officer has a reasonable, articulable suspicion that you are, have, or are about to commit a crime. In the US, this is because one is (supposedly) protected by the 4th ammendment to the constitution, which protects against unlawful search and seizure. Other democratic countries mostly have similar protections.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments