Submitted by batmaninwonderland t3_11af2na in news
bartturner t1_j9t84io wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in U.S. Justice Dept accuses Google of evidence destruction in antitrust case by batmaninwonderland
You missed my entire point. It made ZERO difference.
Nothing in the US and Google has 61%. In the EU they did add the screen and 60%.
The market took care of things and Google won in both places. Google has 15x the market share that Microsoft has.
[deleted] t1_j9tie2m wrote
[deleted]
bartturner t1_j9timgs wrote
But there was NO browser choice law in the US. So we got a pretty good A/B test.
The end result is that Google had 60% and 61%. Basically no difference.
The law made no difference was my entire point.
I find that interesting. It is kind of rare we get such an A/B test to see.
quiplaam t1_j9uezxz wrote
Google started winning in the browser space because early chrome and it's v8 rendering engine was soooooo much faster then the competition. By 2010, web programs got much more complex and Javascript more essential, so speeding that up made everything much better. Additionally, Google's dominance in search meant that it was easy for people to find about and try it out. It got better and better, while IE was stagnant. It is likely that the EU's regulations had minimal impact on on the adoption of Chrome
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments