Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

super_delegate t1_j75t53c wrote

Yea but that’s not that specific, “gang on gang, our work here is done boys”! Obviously there’s more to it, that’s not clear is what the article is saying. Also, it’s a 16yo mom and a 10mo old baby… “gang on gang”. SMH

13

Imaginary_Medium t1_j7964ak wrote

Only pigs and cowards would murder a little teen girl and a baby. They might think they are men but they are lower than pigs.

2

Mrg220t t1_j76yp76 wrote

If the 16 year old decided to put her own kid in danger by being in a gang then she's partly responsible for the baby's death.

I have issue with the title of this post. It's framing it as if it's a random mass shooting. When it's not.

−7

shewy92 t1_j772qtq wrote

Jesus dude, you're really victim blaming a 16 year old and her infant getting shot?

And the title doesn't frame it as a random shooting, you're the one framing it as such

5

Mrg220t t1_j77x533 wrote

I'm blaming the mum for the death of the infant? Of course.

It's her fault to be involved in gangs and to endanger her baby.

Do you not blame parents that put their kids in danger willingly?

The title obviously left out an important part of the shooting which is that both the victims and the perpetrators are gang members.

That's like saying "Thousands of people shot to death in Europe today". Without telling people that it's in the war in Ukraine.

1

gilbertgrappa t1_j7altg7 wrote

Six people from the same family were killed, but you are blaming the two children? You don’t even know if she was in the gang with her family members or if she was just collateral damage.

1