This ‘climate-friendly’ fuel comes with an astronomical cancer risk | Pollution theguardian.com Submitted by Underwood4EverHoC t3_119yc54 on February 23, 2023 at 1:57 PM in news 72 comments 672
Frumpy_little_noodle t1_j9qsq7q wrote on February 23, 2023 at 10:14 PM I suppose if they use the logic that "fewer humans = better environment" they would have a solid argument. Permalink 4
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments