Myheelcat t1_j9n7gij wrote
Earth master on YT has a live feed of worldwide earthquake activity. He is excellent on explaining the movements and stresses that move along the fault lines after a earthquake
Ambitious_Jello t1_j9nu573 wrote
Where's the next one happening?
DPPthrowaway1255 t1_j9o10wl wrote
Consider this thought experiment: you have a rope that is attached to a wall. The other end of the rope is wrapped around a spool that rotates slowly, steadily increasing the tension on the rope.
At one point the rope will snap. It is your job to predict that point in time ten seconds in advance, by just using your eyes.
Predicting earthquakes is hard.
Mental_Medium3988 t1_j9ocb7g wrote
i feel like i should be nervous living in the pnw. everywhere else is relieving pressure as normal... and were "overdue".
hibelly t1_j9ozsss wrote
I'm in the PNW and I'm nervous as fuck
Projectrage t1_j9qa80z wrote
Cascade subduction will be devastating for any body on the coast…a potential 7 story wave with 40sec notice. Then no way of getting help. PNW needs to invest in helicopters. Past the mountains will be earthquakes. Inland will not be bad, but brick and masonry places will understandably have issues, but the coast will be deadly.
thadeusthesecond t1_j9ql9dh wrote
I drove back to Vancouver from tofino the other week. If one tree drops on any of those roads, then I don't see how anyone makes it out in time.
[deleted] t1_j9q68lg wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9q9vgg wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9qzvb9 wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_j9olddc wrote
[removed]
Disquietudette t1_j9o5lr2 wrote
interesting analogue. Would you care to elaborate what parts of the Earth are playing the parts of wall, rope and spool?
DPPthrowaway1255 t1_j9o6k7o wrote
There‘s no 1:1 analogue, I just was looking for the most simple setup of a system where an increase in tension leads to an explosive release of energy. To demonstrate how hard it can be to make a prediction.
Disquietudette t1_j9orbt9 wrote
thanks for answering! I understand it’s hard but if you absolutely would need to come up with a sort of analogue to explain the causative mechanism of earthquakes to a layman, what sort of things would describe it best? Provided that it still remains a simplified generalization? I’m sorry if i come across as stubbornly persistent but i really don’t have a concise understanding of how to explain this phenomenon to myself or others and you seem like a person who might be able to do that.
edit: why the fuck am i downvoted for asking a question? How fucking stupid are you people? If one can’t ask, one might never learn either and learning is something we seemingly need all the more when people are behaving like you are.
DPPthrowaway1255 t1_j9ouwwo wrote
Maybe imagine rubbing two bricks against each other: they have a rough surface, so at some point the irregularities will interlock and block the movement and you have to increase pressure to get them to slide again. When that happens, the two bricks will move quickly until the next irregularity in the surface gets in the way.
Disquietudette t1_j9ozc7t wrote
thanks for your answer! I understand it better now.
Wand_Cloak_Stone t1_j9q9q2n wrote
I thought you asked politely and that other people probably had the same or similar questions due to not everyone on Reddit being a seismologist. Sorry you got downvoted for trying to learn. Your edit could have been a bit more graceful, though.
Disquietudette t1_j9qg7ct wrote
I thought everything i did would be commendable. I try to be what i wish others would also be. I try to learn, i ask clear questions and even try to put the question in a form that would be easy to understand and the one answering would have less trouble in figuring out what i am asking, i thank for every answer and try to reply something worthwhile. I stay humble because i know so little. I ask questions to engage people, strike a conversation and bring forth people wiser and more knowledgeable than myself, try to make the knowledge approachable for myself and others. I try to take account the appearance of my questions: i know my questions might be felt as stubborn and the knowledge might be hard to be distilled in a form accessible to ignorant people like myself. So everything i did i felt was what should be done and still i was downvoted. So because of this i feel people who are downvoting are acting contrary to reason and good manners and people who are acting like that are.. stupid? And stupidity.. should be called out? I think it serves the stupid people best if someone calls out their behavior as it lets them know of their shortcomings. I know i didn’t do it gracefully but in a stupid manner. All downvoters: i wish you well. Please act in a way you wish others would act towards you.
Wand_Cloak_Stone t1_j9qgq8g wrote
Reddit is just fickle. I’ve made the same comment two different times before, in the same sub but in different threads/on different days, and had one get downvoted to hell and the other with 1000 upvotes. Don’t let it bother you, a lot of people on this site are very young and need to develop a bit of maturity.
Disquietudette t1_j9qh8a6 wrote
thanks for your words kind stranger. I have noticed a similar pattern. I try to not let it bother me.
Sir_Synn t1_j9pkrtu wrote
Have a brick laying on a countertop with a large rubber band wrapped around in on the side so the brick has full contact on the counter. Pull the rubber band like your trying to move the brick in one direction and measure with a ruler the length the rubber band stretches before the brick moves. You'll find that there is no pattern in your measurements when you do this, and it seems the distance before the brick moves is random. This experiment emulates that elestic nature and friction of plate tectonics rubbing against each other and why we haven't been able to predict exactly when earthquakes happen.
Disquietudette t1_j9pyin2 wrote
thank you for your insightful answer!
[deleted] t1_j9ot0na wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9ofaz0 wrote
[removed]
bdigital1796 t1_j9q0uum wrote
my cats high-tail away 11 seconds in advance. they know something I don't
Ambitious_Jello t1_j9o18zo wrote
It's a joke. I know it's hard
GrotesquelyObese t1_j9o4imx wrote
It’s hard. I know it’s a joke.
teenagesadist t1_j9o6j5r wrote
It's a hard joke. I know.
aGrlHasNoUsername t1_j9o8w5w wrote
Joke know hard I.
Catssonova t1_j9o1ozk wrote
There's a joke to be made here
meganahs t1_j9obzvz wrote
(Please not Yellowstone).
Myheelcat t1_j9owy6y wrote
There has been some activity near mt Rainer the past few days. I try to keep a close eye on that stuff. I’m originally from so cal and have been thru Whittier, northridge, landers quakes. My family is still there so any insight I could give them gives me a little piece of mind. I told my mom to by a prepaid satellite phone just in case something really bad happens
[deleted] t1_j9p6vf1 wrote
[removed]
Myheelcat t1_j9owgi9 wrote
He doesn’t necessarily say where it will happen, I’m not super versed in tectonic activity but from what I have gathered from him is once a big quake happens that energy ripples down the fault in both directions and it has to “realign “ if there’s any stuck parts of the plate as the energy is traveling you get another quake. He truly is fascinating and it is great to watch, but I’m into history, documentaries, how it’s made type stuff…so it’s right on my alley.
[deleted] t1_j9nxbry wrote
[removed]
ClassicT4 t1_j9o1n55 wrote
My cause would be near another fault line.
apexsubthrowaway42 t1_j9p0sje wrote
Please do not fall for "earthquake prediction" quacks. Check out r/Earthquakes if you want real, qualified answers to questions and discussion that isn't based on pseudoscience. Channels like "Earth Master" are charlatans.
Myheelcat t1_j9pd2kv wrote
I don’t understand how relaying data can be considered pseudoscience? It not like he says, there gonna be a earthquake here. He evaluates data that has been reviewed by usgs. If it is unsubstantiated he notes it has not been reviewed by a seismologist.
apexsubthrowaway42 t1_j9pe9va wrote
Ah yes, someone who posts 3 videos a day with titles giving "San Andreas fault updates" surely isn't a grifter. He is not qualified in any sense of the word. Every single earthquake charlatan uses sources like the USGS to give them a scrap of credibility.
Myheelcat t1_j9pi1i0 wrote
That maybe the case. But for the simple folk like me the data is well presented so I can take it in and no hurt myself. To each his own friend! 😉
apexsubthrowaway42 t1_j9pilxi wrote
It's not that there's no harm in it, it's that you don't see the harm because it's obscured.
[deleted] t1_j9nyo5x wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments