Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

f4d3 t1_j4vbifh wrote

Honestly I'm not surprised with how expensive cars and medical expenses are nowadays. Imagine hitting a 100k car and you only have $15k liability?

11

Linenoise77 t1_j4vhb8d wrote

The state really needs to raise the minimum liability amount.

It is not that much more expensive to move to a 100\300 plan from the pitifully low minimum limits, and people fuck themselves financially in the long term because they think they can save a few bucks today.

You will spend the next 20 years with garnishments\etc if you carry minimum insurance and get into an accident with even a modest newer car these days.

3

MyNameIsDaveToo t1_j4vhfto wrote

Misleading/clickbait title. Per the article, this only affects insurance rates for folks who are only carrying the minimum of liability coverage, because that minimum is what is increasing.

25

SquirrelBoy t1_j4vlzvy wrote

I got hit by a car crossing the street two years ago. I was a pedestrian with the light. They only paid out the minimum $15K per policy. A lifetime of trauma and because of low limits I'm barely compensated. There's nothing scarier than the fire lane at a Shop Rite now.

13

EmbracedByLeaves t1_j4vp1mg wrote

And yet the state still allows the 'Dollar-a-Day' insurance that carries no liability coverage at all.

5

111110100101 t1_j4vvzeb wrote

I’m surprised this isn’t more common knowledge. There’s probably almost a million people on this plan. If they hit you you’re literally getting nothing. Uninsured/underinsured coverage is a must.

Although I guess it’s marginally better than them driving uninsured, which is what most of them would end up doing. Got to get to work somehow.

3