Comments
InnovativeFarmer t1_ixj4by1 wrote
Unless we can widen the ways across the Hudson or add more crossing, making the the NJTP wider just means more cars get to the bottlenecks faster. There are four ways to cross the Hudson. 3 are connected to the NJ Turnpike. The Tappenzee Bridge is a bit north but still acceptable sometimes to avoid traffic, especially if you are going north of the city.
I hope more crossings are added.
Trainlover1279 t1_ixj4ina wrote
The wait will be the same since it's the same amount of lanes going across the Hudson.
[deleted] t1_ixj6y2s wrote
[deleted]
stevenfrijoles t1_ixjblcy wrote
If the bottleneck into NYC still exists, then there won't be any difference on the NYC side, which is why their complaint is silly. And if they're complaining about this, oh boy, just wait until they get the opportunity to complain about improving actual real crossing capacity
InnovativeFarmer t1_ixjf56k wrote
I mean they need to build more crossings along the Hudson. I have crossed over quite frequently since I have family and friends that live in MA and I lived there for a bit. The traffic is bad in the vicinity of the crossings and during busy hours. I recently crossed over the GW and it was smooth both ways around mid-morning to mid-day but I did hit traffic going north near Connecticut. Really bad traffic. But thats typcial for CT.
We need more way to cross the Hudson.
DerSturmbannfuror t1_ixjfc95 wrote
if they want to spend that much money, they should just shoot their shot and propose putting Bayonne/Jersey City protion underground
DerSturmbannfuror t1_ixjfhvj wrote
tbf with the way investment is going in JC, mmany of those cars would never cross the HUdson
Trainlover1279 t1_ixjfo6g wrote
Gotta invest in some of the busier local roads with all the development going on around here.
DerSturmbannfuror t1_ixjgzck wrote
walking around downtown and esp Journal Square, there isn't really much they can to vis a vis easing the coming auto nightmare in those areas, except for making more of those roads one way (which is something i guess) the roads are too narrow to be widened without using current pedestrian ROWs, not to mention the great bike lanes that they've instituted. JC needs to invest in better public transit into the city, they need express bus lanes on their north/south routes (JFK blvd, Palisade ave, Bergan, Westside, Garfield aves, hopefully a light rail thru journal square somehow or something. upgrade the jitneys, give them priority or something but the Last thing i'd want to do is commute there via car in say, 3 years. as bad as it is now the traffic is going to be muy merde once the a lot of those buildings are done. all imho of coiurse
Trainlover1279 t1_ixjke8a wrote
Those roads L, yea not much can be done.
goatsetron9000 t1_ixkjphj wrote
i’m here to widen your highway
thrshptwon t1_ixku7h3 wrote
A train pls get some cars off the road
fatandlean t1_ixl8rlb wrote
It’s clear after a number of uncanny predictions that we should be using the Simpsons as a guide for what is to come in the future.
I therefore propose a monorail.
The_CumBeast t1_ixln4u7 wrote
dualOWLS t1_ixlquo2 wrote
The Big Dig 2: Bigger and Diggier
CPT_Shiner t1_ixm0s70 wrote
"I've sold monorails to Brockway, Ogdenville, and North Haberbrook, and by gum it sure put them on the map!"
thrshptwon t1_ixmxa08 wrote
One of them Chunnels deep under the earth
skinnylemur t1_ixp57j5 wrote
It used to take me 90 minutes to get from my apt in JC to the garage at 43rd & 8th. It would take me 7 minutes to get home.
Trainlover1279 t1_ixq1rqi wrote
That's just disgusting.
stevenfrijoles t1_ixipvro wrote
Those people should be laughed off the face of the earth.