Submitted by Inner_Parsley7691 t3_11xkedn in newjersey
I hope this is the right sub and that someone can help. Sorry if this is long! An underwriter told me I must add my boyfriend and their parent to my policy as listed drivers and pay for them because I live with my boyfriend in a home owned by one of his parents. It is not the parent’s primary residence. Bf and parent are not passengers nor drivers in my car. Both have their own cars, car insurance, and health insurance. If I go anywhere with bf, we take his car. I purposely do this because my car is not in great shape. I use it to commute to work only. I asked to exclude them for these reasons. Underwriter said no, they’ve never heard of such a thing, it’s the law etc… and sent me a non renewal notice. I called back and spoke to a supervisor who gave me a slightly different answer. They said that I would at least have to add my boyfriend as a listed driver and pay for him on my policy because I have PIP added to my policy. He said even though though my boyfriend may not DRIVE my car or cause property damage, I would still need to add him in case he sustained bodily injury as a passenger, even if he is never a passenger. Supervisor said this is because bf lives in the same household as me 50% or more of the time and the parent does not. Supervisor would not let me fill out a named driver exclusion form for boyfriend. The supervisor was very hesitant to give me yes/ no answers and was insinuating that I have been committing insurance fraud this whole time because I agreed to “these terms” when I bought my auto policy years ago and never listed bf on my policy. I never hid this from my insurance and was never told to add anyone to my policy until now. I’m also really confused why 2 representatives from the same department would give me different answers when given the same exact information. I asked to file a complaint against the first representative because they gave me incorrect information which caused my policy to not get renewed. Supervisor literally told me I should not do that. I spoke to other insurance companies/ agents in my area and they’re telling me I definitely should’ve been able fill out a driver exclusion form both of them if I wanted to. Is there really no way around this? I have Progressive and live in NJ. I’m probably going to switch anyway but I want to know what is correct. Thanks for reading!
manningthehelm t1_jd3s46y wrote
I am a licensed agent, with experience in underwriting, state compliance, worked as a claim adjuster and now I supervise complaints to the state DOBI and our compliance record.
If they say you must add them if they have regular access to your car, this sounds like an underwriting guideline (like a rule) the carrier has, it was already approved by the state and no complaint will change that. Now it might not make sense to you or me, but if they have it, that’s it.
From a reasonable underwriting standpoint: If they maintain own insurance, they do not need to be added to your policy as they already have primary coverage and Progressive should not demand you pay primary coverage on someone whom already has it. If they do, while a weird choice, you have to do it or get other insurance.
For instance your boyfriend. Does he have his own insurance? If so, he doesn’t need to be added. If he is covered under his parents’ policy, who you said do not live with you, he may not actually be “covered.” Some carriers require covered drivers to live at the same address, with some exceptions like college or deployment and this MIGHT be why they are requiring you to add him.
Regarding the PIP, his policy covers him in your car. NJ PIP coverage follows the insured from their own policy, if they have one. It’s not extended from the person’s car they sit inside.
Depending on your age there might be other carriers that offer you better rates. This subreddit has tons of posts about insurance companies like GEICO, USAA, NJM, Liberty Mutual, etc.
Post on r/Insurance for more input but make sure you include the state in your post as different states have different rules.