Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Practical_Argument50 t1_je382nr wrote

Reply to comment by takemynerjy in Petition: Don’t widen the NJ Turnpike in South Jersey by takemynerjy

We do have on peak and off peak pricing right now which is congestion pricing. Except we aren’t sensitive to it. We will pay what ever it take to ride the road. Congestion pricing in NYC I believe will be the same traffic won’t improve. We need to build alternatives.

0

takemynerjy OP t1_je38ocn wrote

Not congestion pricing. It doesn't scale with real time congestion. NYC's program will be the first in the country.

You can't conclude people will pay whatever it takes to ride the road based on pathetically low tolls relative to the full social cost of driving. CP is another policy with lots of research behind it. It works.

It negates widening.

I propose alternatives in the petition.

1

baylee13070 t1_je6jn5c wrote

Most widening doesn't help with traffic. But widening were there is a bottleneck because a highway goes from four lanes to three or three to two does make sense sometimes. I'm all for the widening of route 17 between route 4 and where the lights begin because that will get rid of the bottle neck. I'm against the widening of the turnpike extension towards the holland tunnel because the bottle neck is really cause by the tunnel, not the drop off of lanes. (Leavening the tunnel it might make sense).

1

Practical_Argument50 t1_je6kn40 wrote

For the turnpike extension they only want to move the jam from the tollbooths to further down.

2

Practical_Argument50 t1_je6kt00 wrote

Also keeping RT 24 at three lanes to 287 would help it from being so slow from the Short Hills mall.

2