Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

GreatGrandaddyPurp t1_j4jui2s wrote

Sometimes looks can be deceiving. Sometimes...

49

smartest_kobold t1_j4kuhfd wrote

Half the guys in this state look like that.

27

rudyattitudedee t1_j4ny2ij wrote

Half are a bit downsy and the rest of them are average. I guess I’d be downsy. Kinda sad about that.

1

Glucose12 t1_j4lizde wrote

We all look like that after a night of drunken "revelry", I guess. Lots of it, I'd guess.

0

[deleted] t1_j4jiqrd wrote

[deleted]

9

ZacPetkanas t1_j4ldo55 wrote

> Littlefield was held without bail and is expected in court on Tuesday.

5

Glucose12 t1_j4lj8c0 wrote

I'd guess that the part where he discharged the firearm and projectiles entered the next unit will be the thing that gives him jail time instead of just a fine.

1

otiswrath t1_j4mm8s1 wrote

The article literally says "held without bail".

JFC, the smallest amount of effort to glance over the article was too much for you. Apparently you would just rather make shit up to be outraged about.

2

[deleted] t1_j4mmlbb wrote

[deleted]

−2

otiswrath t1_j4mnec2 wrote

"It was sarcasm..."

Was it? That would imply that you didn't actually think he would be released on PR. Was that what you meant?

0

rudyattitudedee t1_j4nyarq wrote

Shoot a civilian = out on bail. Shoot a cop = take your mugshot, get your face crumpled in, held without bail and trial set for next nevuary.

2

Glucose12 t1_j4lih2h wrote

OMG. I remember living there for awhile in a previous life. Cheap and close to the U where I worked. Very cheap ... and old ... and run down.

Cheap enough that ... yikes. The people there seemed to be extra-specially "precious".

If the creek next door flooded, half of the first-floor studios in back could flood out right up to waist height.

5

sheila9165milo t1_j4q5778 wrote

LOL, I grew up in Dover and had a friend who lived there in the 90s, his grandmother lived there in a different apartment during the same time frame, and my dad lived there in the 70s. Definitely has not been updated since they were built in the early 70s - same crappy little weed choked "pond" out front and the world's smallest community swimming pool, lol. The studios were decently laid out with privacy area for the bedroom but yeah, I can see how the creek wold flood the place although I never knew anyone who had to deal with that.

1

Glucose12 t1_j4qjqgp wrote

Ha! I was actually there long enough to see it get flooded out twice.

One time it was enough for a lot of the cars in that large parking lot to the WSW to have water up to their hubcaps. It follows the slope of the land, so the cars in the north end of it were high and dry, and the ones at the other end... yeah.

The other time was bad. I remember wading out(knee level) to the back side, and actually seeing people trying to get into the studios on the South/SSE side(closest to the brook), wading in to them at about waist height. Those were down at ground level, as opposed to the rest of the facility which was built up on a berm to a certain extent. Some of the people going in were, I think, workers for OML trying to ensure that breakers were shut off, etc(?)

I think they may have decommissioned that row of studios after that(?)

PS: That "pond"! I'm sure the frogs loved it once it got choked by cattails.

2

sheila9165milo t1_j4sa0k2 wrote

LOL, what a major drag! I had no idea those places flooded out so badly. However, with the acceleration of global warming since the 90's, I guess it doesn't surprise me. I'm sure the city building inspectors told them to shut down those units b/c you know Corporate America would have just kept renting them out...

2

Glucose12 t1_j4si0u4 wrote

This was actually back in the mid/early 2000's, so well before the current spate of environmental wackiness. Just a "normal" one out of ten year flood probability. I wonder how much the OML developers paid to grease the palms of the insurance adjusters.

2

Glucose12 t1_j4si5qo wrote

Not sure they're even a "corporation", but they had the sleaze sufficient for an org suffering from corporatism/sleaze.

2

sheila9165milo t1_j4vb2kg wrote

That's what I meant, typical business as usual for businesses to get away with crap we individuals aren't able to.

2

baxterstate t1_j4qfqok wrote

If Bruce doesn’t go to prison, can he be evicted and have this event on his record so that it will surface on a background check?

I used to be a landlord, and I would have wanted to know if an applicant did something like this. Knowing this, I wouldn’t have rented to him.

I realize having an event like this coming up on a background check would make it nearly impossible to get an apartment, but bad behavior should come with bad consequences.

0

smartest_kobold t1_j4ku2ci wrote

Taken alive.

−4

Glucose12 t1_j4ljpe5 wrote

Police in that area(Durham/Dover/Lee) seem pretty easy-going. No significant gang-banger crime in the area to make them worry about getting shot down. Probably just dealing with taking fentanyl OD's to the hospital, the less-than-occasional UNH student working on their DUI scorecard, etc.

9

Glucose12 t1_j4n6v0k wrote

PS: To the person who just deleted all of their comments, statistics show that there were -3- police shootings in NH in 2020. I'm not sure why you brought that up.

2

[deleted] t1_j4mpr1p wrote

[deleted]

0

Glucose12 t1_j4n3xwy wrote

I think the word "relatively" could have been included, sure.

1

[deleted] t1_j4n4ew9 wrote

[deleted]

1

Glucose12 t1_j4n5ush wrote

Just a bunch of coordinated gang or otherwise organized crime. Of course, I could be wrong, but it doesn't -feel- like there's that much going on in the immediate Durham/Dover/Portsmouth corridor. Maybe I'm just living a protected life. :-D

1

Novasadog t1_j4l1nwj wrote

Why is the investigation 'ongoing '? And why does there need to be an investigation?

−16

CheliceraeJones t1_j4lcy9c wrote

>why does there need to be an investigation?

Is this a real fucking question? Goddamn

16

Novasadog t1_j4m72qi wrote

Yes, it's a real question, what is your problem?

−8

CheliceraeJones t1_j4n04uo wrote

Damn, now I feel bad... They're investigating the circumstances surrounding the incident so they know what happened and so they will know what to charge the guy with.

3

Plastic_Bleach t1_j4lipgf wrote

They want to find out as much as they possibly can to determine how they should press charges, if anyone was hurt, if there's property damage, etc....

5

Glucose12 t1_j4ljtw1 wrote

The level of endangerment to others will probably determine whether this is just a fine and minor imprisonment, or major imprisonment.

4

Novasadog t1_j4m7l7w wrote

Really? Because I put a gun to my head, and ended up in jail for 3 weeks. This dude actually shot the fucking gun, and there's an investigation?

−5

Glucose12 t1_j4mss8s wrote

Like I said, there's no question that he'll be charged with something, the question is, what can they charge him with. Why did you have a problem with what I said? They're trying to make sure they don't miss/undercharge him.

2

are_we_in_a_fight t1_j4ni8cb wrote

Geeze, my man. It's standard procedure. It would serve you well, especially considering that you have experience in the judicial system, to do some research on how it all works.

1

rudyattitudedee t1_j4nzcxi wrote

I’m not exactly a lawyer but I know a lil bit. Usually, especially when it involves units being shot at, the DA will put together a case for the judge to consider how dangerous an individual is and whether or not they should be held without bail pending trial (done) and how much of a danger to society a person might be. They need time to consider the priors (of which I’m sure there are some, being judgmental about it) and put together a case for the judge and recommend the sentence to the judge who weighs that among other factors. This guy will probably get a public defender and tell the guy to plead no contest and, depending on the other factors (is this a first offense?) he is probably looking at 5 years. I mean they could really say “attempted murder on a public servant” etc if they think the charge will stick. That’s what they mean by pending investigation. Think about how much of this shit happens in a DA’s district every day. They need time to process this, among other cases.

1