Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

lendluke t1_j31h2zq wrote

Reply to comment by AuthorSnow in New Hampshire Bill Would Ban “No-Knock” Warrants by AuthorSnow

I can immediately think of the arguement from (hopefully) the minority. They'll argue this will reduce the effectiveness of police. Criminals will have time to flush down evidence, get the warning in order to strike back against police at the front door and therefore NH will become less safe like many big cities that remove the teeth from their police.

−2

asuds t1_j31jfgl wrote

if they can flush their drugs then they didn’t have very much. And if they are heavily armed it doesn’t make a lot of sense to attack their fortified headquarters. Just nab them on their way to buy some lottery tickets and beef jerky!

7

lendluke t1_j31nkd3 wrote

I agree. Also I don't think getting shot is a reasonable escalation of force for having drugs.

3

NckMcC t1_j31lfok wrote

Your position is that having more flushed drugs makes people less safe? Do you hear yourself ?

−1

lendluke t1_j31ndpa wrote

...no, I was guessing what opponents of this bill would say.

3