Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

cwalton505 t1_j2dvbbf wrote

That's not how public services work or survive. What you're speaking to is libertarian naivete at best and selfishness at worst. Everyone benefits from a well educated society.

15

5nd t1_j2dxz0h wrote

Everyone benefits from many things, that doesn't have any bearing on whether what he's saying will work or not.

−5

cwalton505 t1_j2e00m1 wrote

I'm saying his idea won't work well. If anything we need more funding for education not relegating it down to volunteer based. And to your point if we have something that clearly benefits everyone we would be stupid to not fund it publicly.

2

5nd t1_j2e3hd4 wrote

If it benefits everyone we don't need to fund it publicly... because everyone stands to benefit from it existing.

You know, like UL.

−2

cwalton505 t1_j2e3piq wrote

Thats some upside down thinking like trickle down economics

3

5nd t1_j2e8e6d wrote

You don't even know what those words mean

−3

cwalton505 t1_j2e97db wrote

I do actually. I can try and help you understand them as well, if you'd like.

3

nudgetravel t1_j2fosr5 wrote

So you're saying that your vision only works if it involves theft. All I'm asking is to make in consensual. Opt-in.

−5