Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

DethKnotWurst OP t1_iybn31y wrote

Personally, I would probably side with beavers over snowmobilers just about every time. This is sad.

28

arthur_taff t1_iybp5ry wrote

Why didn't they just... build a better bridge? Or move it? Why'd they mess with a perfectly natural Beaver colony?

19

stanmeower t1_iybpa2f wrote

What happened to the beavers? This makes me upset that they just destroyed a natural habitat for they're convenience.

18

ImprintVector t1_iycl2ju wrote

This is just another story of a small entitled group of asshats destroying our state. Leave the fucking beavers alone.

22

Azr431 t1_iycpd6j wrote

So a lone special interest outdoorsman group ruined an entire natural ecosystem because they built an inadequate bridge? I'd be pissed off too, fuck these guys

36

Halfameetball t1_iycpivr wrote

So I've seen this most of my life. I live in a Town with a lot of fire roads and the snowmobile club maintains them for the town. There are many Beaver ponds with the beaver dams built right up against the snowmobile bridges. Every 5 years or so the Beaver dams need to be removed because they get so large. The water goes around the bridge instead of under it. It only takes a year for the Beavers to rebuild and fill the pond again.

It's a cycle. The beavers will rebuild. They always do. Unless they trap them...

13

RFausta t1_iycqz6e wrote

Resident of Bow, attended the post-destruction town meeting, involved in other town groups as well. The snowmobile club has shown basically zero regrets, posted on Facebook about how awesome they are and everyone should love them, and are basically a pile of asshats who knew what they were about to do, did an endrun around the town and regulations, and have absolutely no respect for anyone.

The town select board was largely unaware of what they were voting on- only the Town Manager said he knew what the work would entail, the other selectboard members did not know it would involve removing the dam entirely, draining the pond, and trapping and killing the beavers. Most people, selectboard and others, were unaware and/or misled that “removing debris” actually meant removing the whole dam and draining the pond.

18

RFausta t1_iycr5gn wrote

Their vocal representatives keep trying to argue they were “restoring” the natural environment because it was a stream.. in the 1960’s. 🙄

8

smartest_kobold t1_iycvqy5 wrote

The beavers have been doing this for a couple million years and haven't poisoned the water with PFAS so far. I say we let the beavers run things for a while.

28

gman2391 t1_iycy8p0 wrote

Probably because the bridge is located on a class vi town road. Relocating the bridge would be prohibitively expensive assuming another suitable location could even be found. From the pictures in the article, it is clear the dam had grown higher than the bridge and if it let go during a spring flood it could take out the bridge, part of the road, any people in the area and could cause other issues downstream. There are obviously 2 sides to every story

2

USA-cubicle-worker t1_iycydxz wrote

These snowmobilers are absolute morons and the town board is filled with dipshits. BUT!!!.....

We killed and scared off all of the beavers natural predators to move in a build our homes around the pond, so human management of the beavers is necessary. "Leave the beavers" alone is not an option, because we didn't leave the bears, wolf, coyote, foxes, snakes, birds of prey alone a century or more ago to manage the beavers themselves. They should have consulted with the State Fish and Wildlife department and requested help to manage the situation for the best of the ecosystem.

I blame the town for this...

7

SillyIce t1_iyd2muc wrote

Leave the beavers alone! Is it true they were trapped and killed?

13

Most_Expert_8080 t1_iyd2vck wrote

Maybe, but they will obviously kill them again. Whenever a place has decided that beavers are a menace to their society then its over for them. Especially when it is a thing like a snowmobile club.

4

gman2391 t1_iyd2xs5 wrote

There are house abutting the downstream wetland only a few hundred feet from the dam. Not saying they're at risk necessarily, but a dam suddenly letting go does have the potential to cause issues downstream.

My comment about people was intended to be primarily directed at the bridge and the immediate area though. The bridge and trail are used by a lot more than just snowmobilers.

1

dilznoofus t1_iyd5ezd wrote

coming here from MN, why do you need to make bridges and stuff to get to trails in the winter - is it because the water doesn't freeze solid? you don't get enough snow? I don't get it.

either way those are both bad signs for any hope for happy snowmobiling.

spent my childhood zooming across frozen lakes and streams on a sled, I can't imagine us blowing up a beaver dam... that would just make more frozen flat space for cruising.

100% support putting the beavers back and letting the snowmobilers figure out another path, they are the smart apes with opposable thumbs... if we can put people on the moon you can probably figure out how to get to your trail without destroying the beaver habitat

9

roborob11 t1_iyda3rw wrote

There’s a short article in the December issue of the Scientific American reviewing “Beaverland: How one rodent made North America” by Leila Philip. It describes the vast continent as a “lush, wet world … diffuse, messy, spread out … incredibly dynamic … hydrating everything.” (Except the deserts). Here’s to loving beaver(s).

14

A-Do-Gooder t1_iydi3cb wrote

It's absolutely outrageous! To wipe out a keystone species that supported and entire ecosystem, causing death and devastation to much of the local wildlife, negatively impacting the cultural experiences of local community residents, and likely harming local property values, simply because a group of snowmobilers wanted to protect their precious bridge. 🤦🏻‍♂️ I would be incensed if I were a community member.

There were so many mitigating actions they could have taken to address their concerns, such as clearing the previously existing drain, putting in a new drain, raising the bridge, or some other solution to address their concerns. It's called "maintaining" for a reason. Instead, they went DEFCON 5 and destroyed and killed everything. It's completely asinine. That would be like going to the dentist for a minor surface cavity and asking them to remove all of your teeth so that you never have a cavity again. It's preposterous!

5

Able_Cunngham603 t1_iydisdl wrote

Speaking from experience as a landowner, snowmobile clubs tend to be run by entitled douchebags.

Snowmobilers are going to see their trail network start to dwindle if their clubs don’t smarten up.

33

Cantide756 t1_iyekzrr wrote

I didn't think that was legal? I thought they were protected in this state. I know DOT has tons of issues with them mucking stuff up, but can't do anything to the animal.

1