Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Relative_Election_81 t1_iwm7uep wrote

Reply to comment by lMickNastyl in Republicans' margin in N.H. House shrinks again, after recount flips 2nd seat to Dems by rockonritalin

80% success rate. Cope. Establishment GOP shills are continuing to reject him just like they've been doing since before 2016 because they're more interested in making money than representing their voters? I'm shocked! lol at least you tried

−7

lMickNastyl t1_iwm8c8i wrote

Trump being elected in 2016 was because people underestimated him and ran a horrible candidate against him (Hilary being president and Bill being first gentlemen, lmao, get out of here). People have years of judgement now, everyone knows what he is about and is either pro or against him. No one is independent when it comes to trump.

8

Relative_Election_81 t1_iwm8xwd wrote

He got millions more votes in 2020 than he did in 2016. he had an 80% success rate with his endorsements in this last election, and the Republicans won the popular vote by 5 million, despite the Dems engaging in dirty tactics like ballot harvesting and despite the GOP actively trying to sabotage many of the candidates he endorsed. As I said, reality simply does not conform with the narrative you're desperately trying to push.

−3

lMickNastyl t1_iwm969z wrote

You can't just scream conspiracy when you lose and have no evidence to back it up. Literal sheep like you like to believe everyone else is. Even though you just swallow what you hear on TV like a good boy.

8

Relative_Election_81 t1_iwm9e2m wrote

I didn't say anything about any conspiracies, when you're forced to argue against what you wish I said instead of what I actually said you're admitting that you don't have a leg to stand on and are so far out of your depth that you can't even try to form a coherent response. Thank you for conceding the argument, take care.

0

lMickNastyl t1_iwm9kmf wrote

"Ballot harvesting"

Lmao take care bud

6

Relative_Election_81 t1_iwm9paj wrote

That's not a conspiracy theory you absolute clown, they're not even trying to hide that they are doing it. try reading the news sometime 🤣

−1

lMickNastyl t1_iwmcf0k wrote

Mhm any day now they're gonna blow the lid off the whole lie! Any...day.

6

Relative_Election_81 t1_iwmcrxr wrote

You're confused. What's happening here is that you think I'm talking about voter fraud when in reality what I'm talking about is totally legal in the places where it's happening, at least for the most part. You think I'm talking about something completely different than what I'm actually talking about because you don't read the news, so in your ignorance you are making baseless assumptions. How embarrassing for you.

1

lMickNastyl t1_iwmeybc wrote

AP quotes an academic I much respect: “There’s no evidence a massive ballot harvesting scheme dumped a large amount of votes for one candidate into drop boxes, and if there were, it would likely be caught quickly, according to [Iowa law professor] Derek Muller.”

I'll admit of all the different conspiracies, this is the one that at least deserves a little skepticism. That being said there is no evidence whatsoever it's being used to change any outcome.

That bullshit 2000 mules has brought shit like this into the spotlight where before it was only heard in conspiracy circles.

5

Relative_Election_81 t1_iwmf6u4 wrote

I love it how I keep calling you out for assuming I'm talking about something I'm not, and you just can't help but continuing to do exactly that every single time 🤣 Go get yourself educated on current events before you try discussing political issues, you are not currently equipped to have grown up conversations. Take care, and thank you once again for conceding the argument by refusing to operate in good faith.

1