Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

BobKelso14916 t1_ivrn74x wrote

Reply to comment by [deleted] in Missouri legalized weed; must all backwards states legalize it before us? by BSPINNEY2666

Lol, so angry at strangers for being frustrated at a victimless crime being illegal?

And you’re flat out wrong, it is a conspiracy to not change immoral laws to benefit police/prison lobbies.

23

AKBigDaddy t1_ivtpiwr wrote

> And you’re flat out wrong, it is a conspiracy to not change immoral laws to benefit police/prison lobbies.

Yeah no... in NH it's straight up because they want to control the means of sale just like they do in Alcohol, but doing so is risky on an item that is federally illegal.

0

BobKelso14916 t1_ivtq4jr wrote

Nope you’re definitely wrong here, you can still make it legal for recreational use without touching that side of the sales part, which still would help prevent innocent people being punished and put in cages for a victimless crime. You’re being manipulated by big lobbies just like the angry guy who commented above.

4

AKBigDaddy t1_ivtuejz wrote

> you can still make it legal for recreational use without touching that side of the sales part

You can, but they don't want to, not because of wanting to keep people criminals, but because they want to capture the profit from sales. It's all about the money here. The state want to be the sole retail distributor in NH, just like they are for liquor.

2

BobKelso14916 t1_ivtw3as wrote

Hahaha- as I said, you’re heavily manipulated and flat out wrong here. How can you say they don’t want to keep people criminals? That’s literally happening because recreational consumption of marijuana is illegal, and could be passed separate from the racket that would be the state making corruptly awarded state run marijuana stores.

0