warren_stupidity t1_iuigy5c wrote on October 31, 2022 at 4:07 PM

The odd jumble of stuff in Q1 - mixing conflict of interest prohibitions (good) with peculiar undefined election processes (dubious) makes this question a mess that should be rejected out of hand.

Q2 - I'm mixed on this, we really need a ballot initiative process and election redistricting reform to end gerrymandering, but a CC is open ended and who knows what would come out of it.

mmirate t1_iuinmoc wrote on October 31, 2022 at 4:52 PM

Q1 is just removing all references in those two sections about a county office that has had all of its duties legislatively removed to other places, so that the office may be dissolved. It looks confusing because the ballot doesn't include the removed parts in stricken-through type.

Whatever happens as a result of Q2 passing, has to be approved by 60% of the voters at the next statewide ballot.

valleyman02 t1_iuisb2k wrote on October 31, 2022 at 5:23 PM

So to my way of thinking legislators made it very confusing on purpose. Seems like they're trying to trick people to me. So there is something sketchy about both of these questions in my mind. I'm voting no on both of these.