I’m looking forward to Winter Rewind and 5nd/Senno trying to spin this as a good thing for Bolduc. Their mental gymnastics should be entertaining.

inquiring minds want to know.

I'm kind of baffled by this.

Its a close race, seems to me Buldoc (a warmongering RINO shill) is perfectly aligned with the can do attitude of Mitch McConnel.

My only thinking is that they are confident that the Gabbard nod and and Jerry Kaufman campaign will be enough to split the right-voting block.

RCP polling average has Hassan up by 5.4% and Republican internal polling may show a wider gap. So, the PAC is deploying these funds to places like Pennsylvania, Georgia, and Arizona…all of which are closer Senate races (according to polling) than NH.

Interesting, everything I read had it a bit narrower or at least framed it as narrower.

I also for some reason read that as RCMP and was like "the fuck canada got to do with this"

[removed]

I saw a poll this morning showing that the difference is 2% at 49% to 47%. I have to question spending huge amounts of ad money at this late stage anyways as you are generally just annoying people.

"We don't need Washington money anyways."

Yes. When you’ve gotten just behind your opponent, that’s when you should take your foot off the gas.

Bold strategy, Cotton. Let’s see if it works out for them.

It was probably the AARP poll which is only people over 50 and isn’t realty super beneficial.

RCP has her up 5.4 and gaining

Abandon the sinking ship

[removed]

It's a B/C poll. 600 Likely Voters, by Fabrizio, Lee & Associates so I'd take it with a grain of salt but it's the only really recent poll. It was also sponsored by Buldoc.

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/senate/2022/new-hampshire/

Simple. They’ll attack McConnell personally.

[removed]

[removed]

They’re probably shifting they’re resources to states where the margins are razor thin.

YeaaH. Seems a bit outlandish he closed the gap that much in a short period of time haha

[removed]

[removed]

You only think it's a close race because of the media. Last time was a close race. Candidates do matter.

polls can be made to say whatever we want - and in recent years they've been used strategically to try and push fence-sitters and the cynical into either not voting or switching.

2016 showed that in spades.

Yea, there's a reason they flag polls as being sponsored by a candidate. You'd want to keep your sponsor happy by giving them good numbers, and by giving them something they can toss to the media and say "Look, we're not losing too badly!"

>“As the cycle comes to a close, we are shifting resources to where they
can be most effective to achieve our ultimate goal: winning the
majority,” Senate Leadership Fund President Steven Law said in a statement.

Translation: This guy is toast. Peace out.