Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

movdqa t1_itbg2cn wrote

I saw a poll this morning showing that the difference is 2% at 49% to 47%. I have to question spending huge amounts of ad money at this late stage anyways as you are generally just annoying people.

5

MiggySmalls6767 t1_itby2ty wrote

It was probably the AARP poll which is only people over 50 and isn’t realty super beneficial.

RCP has her up 5.4 and gaining

6

movdqa t1_itc1cmj wrote

It's a B/C poll. 600 Likely Voters, by Fabrizio, Lee & Associates so I'd take it with a grain of salt but it's the only really recent poll. It was also sponsored by Buldoc.

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/senate/2022/new-hampshire/

5

MiggySmalls6767 t1_itc5ssc wrote

YeaaH. Seems a bit outlandish he closed the gap that much in a short period of time haha

4

BowTiedAgorist t1_itdm7ed wrote

polls can be made to say whatever we want - and in recent years they've been used strategically to try and push fence-sitters and the cynical into either not voting or switching.

2016 showed that in spades.

1

FreezingRobot t1_ite8exi wrote

Yea, there's a reason they flag polls as being sponsored by a candidate. You'd want to keep your sponsor happy by giving them good numbers, and by giving them something they can toss to the media and say "Look, we're not losing too badly!"

1