Submitted by J7eTheGorilla t3_122iz1h in newhampshire
besafenh t1_jdr45s7 wrote
Reply to comment by NeedleworkerNo8029 in Newmarket - THC in the ice cream. Get it while it lasts! by J7eTheGorilla
Unlabeled. Mislabeled would be one thing, unlabeled another. NH Health Department will give the shop a demerit for selling unlabeled product. Likely unnecessary as the shop has no incentive to do so again.
rahnster_wright t1_jdrg21w wrote
It was labeled with flavor and date, which is adequate for products made on site (which the ice cream was since the cafe and ice cream shared a kitchen and a lease). Except, of course, in this very, very egregious example where the labeling was very not adequate.
besafenh t1_jds7dq1 wrote
“However, Enright said, one bucket of coffee-Oreo, mixed with THC, seemingly made by the old owner for personal use, was left behind. Because it was not labeled, she sold it unknowingly to customers.”
rahnster_wright t1_jds9umu wrote
Right. It wasn't labeled as "contains THC." That's what that line is referring to. It was labeled with flavor and date made.
besafenh t1_jdsanql wrote
I read this as unlabeled unlabeled:
“What’s in here? Oh cool, coffee Oreo. We need that.”
the_nobodys t1_jdsjemo wrote
Yeah that makes the most sense
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments