Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

TheodoeBhabrot t1_jbfsmol wrote

Reply to comment by RedLeafRoy in In testimony and rally, crowds oppose Republican-backed bills targeting LGBTQ youth by kitchinsink

So which is it, can’t use pronouns because can’t be forced to adhere to religion or can’t use pronouns because people should be forced to adhere to religions?

11

RedLeafRoy t1_jbfyj62 wrote

I suspect a false dilemma so you would have to show a case in real life

1

TheodoeBhabrot t1_jbfyniz wrote

This isn’t a false dilemma these are both things you’ve said that contradict each other

8

RedLeafRoy t1_jbg2mr0 wrote

well then you would have to explain what you think contradicts each other

−2

TheodoeBhabrot t1_jbg2wwf wrote

You can’t both being against religion being forced on people and be for forcing region on people

3

RedLeafRoy t1_jbg7tui wrote

I'm not for forcing religion on people.

−1

TheodoeBhabrot t1_jbgcl00 wrote

Then why bring up that it goes against “1000 year old religions”? Since by your own admission that shouldn’t be a factorn

4

RedLeafRoy t1_jbgk1as wrote

It's relevant because parents may want to know if their child is taking part in the rituals of a different religion.

0

livefreethendie t1_jbhwvrv wrote

But that is not allowed to be the school's responsibility because the school -as a government entity paid for by tax payer dollars- strictly has to not be religious in any way. That includes 1000 year old religions just as much as whatever you think these parents are concerned about.

If the parents just want to know what's going on in their childrens lives it is their responsibility to develop that relationship and just ask the kids themselves.

2