Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

cwalton505 t1_j9zhqzx wrote

Speculation at best, stop saying it like it's fact. It could be a bunch of other different stupid reasons.

0

juicebronston t1_j9zt9bd wrote

Speculation based on Sununu’s past comments.

Edit: There’s a handful of articles supporting this comment, which you can find on my post history and below. Plug your ears all you want, but Sununu has literally said that he finds a state-run model most appealing, which is why people are speculating that this would be the state’s preferred method.

0

Potential-Village-61 t1_ja3yeos wrote

Makes sense .I mean why should we let the pushers of recreational marijuana in our state when those pushers are from another state and are just using New Hampshire as a golden money egg. Those out of staters ( most likely from Massachusetts ) who are pushing to open stores in our state are the ones who are going to get rich and they will do so without any care of what recreational marijuana has done to crime in every legalized state in the country.

1

cwalton505 t1_j9zv2rw wrote

Quote one

0

juicebronston t1_j9zvwlz wrote

Besides the article I already shared with you, here is another quote regarding a state-run model - “If we’re ever going to do it, that’s probably the right structure to have.”

From here: https://www.seacoastonline.com/story/news/local/2022/04/02/new-hampshire-bill-recreational-marijuana-sales-state-liquor-stores/7244063001/

Edit: You don’t have to like it, but it is true. I don’t know why there are multiple recent accounts saying that these quotes don’t exist, but I figure it has to do with his potential 2024 run?

0

cwalton505 t1_j9zxvl5 wrote

Sorry I missed the part where you shared an article with me on a different reply as I'm going through one at a time. Also as I said there on my other reply, its paywalled. I'm not a mass guy I don't subscribe. I appreciate this link and will take a look

1

drivermcgyver t1_j9zovys wrote

It's literally the reason. The state can't sell something that's classified as a schedule 1 drug.

−2

cwalton505 t1_j9zvdln wrote

Then fucking cite something dude. I speculated this fucking years ago but there has been no traction on it on any official standpoint I've seen.

0