Submitted by arrogant_ambassador t3_10q9ndf in movies
Comments
Huevos___Rancheros t1_j6op569 wrote
I think there might be a slight bias here
ty_kanye_vcool t1_j6oqa45 wrote
What I’m getting from these details is that the film is exactly as bad as the ads make it look, for the exact reasons we all surmised.
MurielHorseflesh t1_j6oqjih wrote
Farrakhan is a piece of shit who is currently pushing Scientology on all the Nation of Islam groups out there. Farrakhan’s views on just about everything are dumb bullshit mixed with irrational hatred
ArchDucky t1_j6ordnu wrote
Its not even remotely funny. Which is fucking weird for a comedy.
YugiPlaysEsperCntrl t1_j6ou5bo wrote
The bias being not wanting wanting lazily written caricatures based on negative stereotypes of Jewish people. Sure, bias.
canoeonmyback t1_j6ov3wo wrote
The movie had funny parts but was generally a disappointment considering I expected hill and Murphy to make a truly funny movie, but everything in this article rings true.
BuddyXLilly t1_j6oygm9 wrote
Shut that off once they started making drake references!
onemanclic t1_j6p3akd wrote
I thought the movie made a big stink of Farrakhan's views and the fact that they are upsetting to a lot of people. But the movie was about a Nation of Islam follower, which is not a small amount of people, so they also spoke of their reverence to him.
The point of this movie is to talk about the cross-racial/religious/cultural divides. If that's what we're calling normalization, then that is what it will take to address the issues of Farrakhan and his beliefs.
jamesneysmith t1_j6pbi51 wrote
Why wouldn't their opinion be valid?
mykleins t1_j6pk1fp wrote
I mean Eddie Murphy’s character was also a lazily written caricature of a pro-black black man who they also made into the primary antagonist. Seems like the insensitivity around portrayed identities goes both ways.
[deleted] t1_j6oozoo wrote
[deleted]