Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

heybigbuddy t1_j6ewzhl wrote

There a handful a find okay, and for me it comes down to this: there has to be a good reason why the story is being told this way. For instance, if the story is told through a handheld camera that’s running for the whole film (like, say, Cloverfield), there has to be a good rationale for that. Most films that use these trips don’t seem to consider them at all, sort of how sitcoms started adopting The Office-style framing. A movie like [REC] comes to mind as doing this successfully, because the characters are reporters and film as much as they can because they think they might expose something suspicious or hidden. Almost every other time, though, it’s just wanting to use shaky cams and limited perspective and security footage regardless of what might be best or most effective.

3

Default_Sock_Issue t1_j6f4orf wrote

On that note. I can't do the interview format on shows either. Some exceptions on both notes are Trailer Park Boys. Never cared for the office myself, I tried to make it through S1 and gave up. Tried parks and rec and boom office format. Done. What we do in the shadows is okay but it took a few false starts and in super small doses

1

heybigbuddy t1_j6g2r3n wrote

So in the British version of The Office, it really matters that they’re being filmed: characters are aware of the camera, people have watched “the show” and seen things they did or said, and the camera affects what people do and the nature of the story. It’s incorporated into it in a thoughtful way.

(The first season of the US Office is the worst until the series is about to end, so I’d encourage anyone to watch it, if only for the season, third, and fourth seasons)

1