Stinsation18 t1_j285cgp wrote
Reply to comment by memer2239 in Bullet train is a really good film by memer2239
Brother, you're missing the point. I'm saying that most people aren't going to rate a film positively based on the amount of blood. I would go as far as to say that most people would rate a film lower for gratuitous amounts of blood, honestly. If that's your thing, I guess that's fine, but don't use it as a talking point when trying to persuade other people on the quality of a film. It's certainly not something that most people will see as a big positive and hurts your argument more than helps it.
memer2239 OP t1_j285z37 wrote
alright you have a point , i should have prob said fighting scenes 💀💀
Mg5581 t1_j28bcr5 wrote
I don’t think anyone would rate a film lower for having a lot of blood, that’s the same logic as liking it more for having a lot of blood. Seasoned movie viewers can handle cinematic violence.
Stinsation18 t1_j28p8qn wrote
No it's not. People are naturally squeamish and have a hard time looking at blood. Maybe not a majority of people, but there is a large contingency of folks that have a hard time with blood and gore. There are a lot of people that love movies and watch movies but avoid the horror and over the top action movies that I'm sure have seen more movies than you and I combined. I would consider them seasoned regardless of they could handle blood or not. I bet we could roll through RT or another movie rating site for this film or another like 300 and we would find people giving it out reviews for the violent stuff but few people praising it for the blood and gore.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments