Submitted by thedarkknight16_ t3_z47g1c in movies
Superb-Possibility-9 t1_ixq7zj5 wrote
The Directors cut is longer ( of course) but you understand the story and the decisions being made by all the main characters much more clearly. Truly the superior version to watch.
BTS_1 t1_ixqq5sy wrote
> you understand the story and the decisions make by all the main characters much more clearly.
This is very true as the Theatrical Cut omits Baldwin V (Sybilla’s son)!
Baldwin V is the catalyst for the second half of the film and the Theatrical Cut doesn’t even feature it lol Whichever Fox Exec decided that is a moron lol
Saviordd1 t1_ixqysvn wrote
It's been a while since I watched the Theatrical Cut.
I can't fathom cutting the child. Jesus. It's such an integral plot point.
djspelleddj t1_ixr3mbd wrote
I would argue they should spend more time on Sybilla's decision to put Baldwin down in the directors cut.
FormerIceCreamEater t1_ixrbb4u wrote
Yeah this is one case where the director's cut was just far superior. So much important context was taken out of the theatrical cut
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments