Logan_No_Fingers t1_iy8ec66 wrote
Reply to comment by boundbylife in Bob Iger Tells Disney Town Hall Hiring Freeze Still In Effect, No New Acquisitions Planned & Not Merging With Apple by HumanOrAlien
Apple is a premium brand.
Its Apple - expensive v Android at free.
Disneyland parks core audience is middle & lower middle earners -
https://www.insider.com/middle-class-most-eager-to-visit-disney-parks-2021-6
IE very few of Apples core target market want to go to Disneyland
The parks are not "high end" influencer. They are garbage people 2000 follower, side line in onlyfans influencers. People earning $50-75k with 7 side hustles, a Robinhood & FTX account.
Apple is not chasing that market.
Darkageoflaw t1_iy8pcie wrote
Almost everyone I know has an iphone lol. You make it sound like Apple only sells to Saudi Princes.
Logan_No_Fingers t1_iy8rm0h wrote
Well that's scientific. And a complete bullshittery of what I wrote
Here you go -
https://www.computerworld.com/article/3668913/you-are-the-product-but-with-an-apple-twist.html
"Apple’s customers tend to be more affluent than those on competing platforms. I’ve seen claims that the mean income of a US Android owner is $69,647, while iPhone user’s make $88,256.
In addition to that, 35% of Apple’s iOS owners have household incomes over $100,000 per year. An iPhone user is also three times more likely than an Android owner to have a total household income over $300,000/annum."
Average Disney park users have a $75k income.
https://www.insider.com/middle-class-most-eager-to-visit-disney-parks-2021-6
"People who earn less than $75,000 are most eager to visit Disney, according to an Insider poll.
Those with yearly incomes over $150,000 were the least interested in taking a Disney vacation."
Darkageoflaw t1_iy8ush9 wrote
More people in the US use iphones than android. It doesn't take a "scientist" to figure out it's a popular device that is owned by people in many economic classes in the US. Most people who have one are on a plan or have an older one. Also Disney World is pretty expensive for a theme park. If I was really cheap I'd go to six flags and have a cheap android (and I do).
Logan_No_Fingers t1_iy8ygvg wrote
> More people in the US use iphones than android. It doesn't take a "scientist" to figure out it's a popular device that is owned by people in many economic classes in the US.
Part of that was right, IOS has roughly 55% of the market.
Where you then veer off into made-up bullshit is when you decide that the economic spread is the same.
I mean GM has a 15% market share in the US, Audi a 7% market share. The average income of their owners are probably the same right?
Darkageoflaw t1_iy900l0 wrote
This is a bizarre argument. Your own article says "People who make under $75,000 per year are most eager to visit Disney, but it's almost unaffordable for them", the keyword is unaffordable. Disney and Apple are popular in general but they are expensive. People who want to go to Disney the most are people who can't afford it, like no shit if you can go anytime it's not special anymore. I bet you could find an article about poor people wanting an iphone more than people who already have one.
Do you really think 55% of Americans don't want to go to Disney world because they are too good for it? That's completely ridiculous lmao. Also Disney is more than just parks. Steve Jobs was one of the head guys at Pixar.
Logan_No_Fingers t1_iy92pdx wrote
> Also Disney is more than just parks.
Yes, it is, but this discussion was based around the idea a huge reason Apple would buy disney is to get parks.
Despite Apple having zero history in that area & zero over lap in target audiences
Darkageoflaw t1_iy94xdp wrote
>zero over lap in target audiences
Where are you getting this information? It's completely made up.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments