Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

arvindnm t1_iy3bxng wrote

I suppose you could check out KGF. It's got two parts (I haven't seen the second one yet) but the first one has got everything you asked for. History, action, music etc.

It's got a 'guy takes on an army' feel to it.

−1

Besan_laddoo_plis t1_iy4umqr wrote

Ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww, please don't feed foreigners bullshit.

11

arvindnm t1_iy4v6ch wrote

Hey I'm not a fan of the movie either, which is why I haven't watched the second one. I'm only giving OP what he asked for.

3

HopefulIndian t1_iyc10br wrote

there is oceans and heavens of diff between an RRR and a KGF. RRR is a character driven aesthetically shot film with great foreshadowing and symbolism(even in MUSIC) whilst KGF is LOUD ASS HERO WORSHIP FILM. U Simply cant put the two films in the same bracket!!

8

arvindnm t1_iycg2o6 wrote

Well objectively speaking, they've both got loud music, hero worship sequences and unbelievable action sequences (by unbelievable I mean "are you kidding me there's no way that guy did that"). KGF has got the hero taking on 50 people? RRR has got the hero taking on 100 people if not more. But wait, it's also got a guy fending off a tiger on his own. So yes, I simply can put it in the same bracket because both of them, to me, are action movies that don't respect the audience's intelligence.

It's like watching a Fast & Furious movie. You know it's going to be over the top but as long as you enjoy it, it doesn't matter. At least to me.

4

HopefulIndian t1_iyesj6m wrote

my bad, only Cinephiles can understand the diff bw a RRR and a KGF!! no point in convincing others. so I rest my case!!

6