[removed]
Comments
emobatwoman t1_ix6l78i wrote
For me it's war movies and I don't mean stories about things happening while war is going on but movies showing actual war - combat/army. Couldn't care less, give me a movie from the 1920s any day though.
Abernader01 t1_ix6lk48 wrote
I’d say there aren’t many movies post pandemic that aren’t any good except for a very small few - very small .
Autoganz t1_ix6m69c wrote
To be fair, 8 1/2 is a very particular film with some high concepts and isn’t really a film with mainstream appeal. It’s also black and white AND in Italian, so you might have to work your way up to something like that.
For black and white films to start with, here are some which might be easier to watch because of their near-universal appeal:
Citizen Kane (1941)
Night of the Hunter (1955)
12 Angry Men (1957)
Some Like It Hot (1959)
Psycho (1960)
Repulsion (1965)
Young Frankenstein (1974)
The Elephant Man (1980)
or my all-time favorite: Sunset Boulevard (1950)
As for me: no movie is too old. That includes stuff like the 1902 classic “A Trip to the Moon.” Old IS gold. I’m 38, btw.
mikeyfreshh t1_ix6mnyr wrote
Great list. I'll add a few
Dr Strangelove
High and Low
The Third Man
Treasure of the Sierra Madre
tinoynk t1_ix6mpw5 wrote
Repulsion might be a bit much for someone just starting to casually getting into movies but the rest are great choices.
I’d also throw in Touch of Evil.
Lritz_Fang t1_ix6mwww wrote
None.
I'm capable of looking past surface details if its a good story and well told.
Autoganz t1_ix6njex wrote
See, most of those I thought about, but I feel those are slightly tougher for people new to black and white films because of their pacing. I kinda think Night of the Hunter straddles the line slightly, and was iffy about including it. These are all great.
High and Low is actually my second fave. Such an intense film. The way Kurosawa blocks the characters into frame is incredible.
mikeyfreshh t1_ix6o9r4 wrote
High and Low is probably my favorite Kurosawa movie (Throne of Blood is a pretty close second) and I think it's also probably his most accessible movie for modern audiences. I think it was influential enough that it should feel familiar to anyone who likes Fincher or Bong Joon Ho. Plus OP mentioned trying to get into 8 1/2 so I felt like I should include a foreign language pic.
Bombadilicious t1_ix6omqy wrote
I usually don't like movies from the 60s. I love things from before and after but 60s movies somehow feel faker.
wattlewedo t1_ix6q0wi wrote
Dambusters, Dunkirk and, of course, It's a Wonderful Life.
BEE_REAL_ t1_ix6vknj wrote
> I kinda think Night of the Hunter straddles the line slightly
Night of the Hunter in my experience provokes reactions split 50/50 between "wow that was incredible I loved everything" and "that was really weird but it was neat I guess"
BEE_REAL_ t1_ix6vl8m wrote
> That includes stuff like the 1902 classic “A Trip to the Moon.”
Which ironically is available in color!
Loud_Geologist_7172 t1_ix6y7j3 wrote
Lawrence of Arabia, 1962. Wizard of Oz was like…. 1933 or something? Miracle on 34th Street was … maybe 1950? Ooh plus the old animated films are fascinating. I love the classics. It reminds us how far filmmaking has come! EDIT: Wizard of Oz was 1939. Miracle on 34th Street was 1947.
Autoganz t1_ix6y809 wrote
True!
And it’s also a short watch.
Nobodycares2022 t1_ix6y8nb wrote
Most movies before the 70's . They're just slow paced and boring . There are the exceptions though like:
Casablanca
The Wizard of Oz
A Mirscle on 34th Street
It's a Wonderful Life
[deleted] OP t1_ix6l5ni wrote
[deleted]