roto_disc t1_itwt06f wrote
Yes.
Herne8 OP t1_itwt3od wrote
Why? Other than Schwarzenegger, what makes it stand out from the rest?
efs120 t1_itwtts5 wrote
Because Conan was a very popular pulp character already. I think it would be less popular in your hypothetical, but there would still be a vocal fanbase for the movie given how important the character has been to so many people.
StandUpForYourWights t1_itwtwd7 wrote
I see you are not a connoisseur of lamentations of their women
Syn7axError t1_itx15st wrote
If Conan doesn't feel original, it's because everyone else ripped it off. The books were groundbreaking.
Herne8 OP t1_itx20j4 wrote
Yes, I've read the books, but I'm talking about the movie.
Syn7axError t1_itx855l wrote
Well, yes. That's what happens when you adapt the one that started it all. It feels unoriginal compared to all the knock-offs. I saw similar complaints about the Northman this year.
But I also think it makes for a better movie. Conan is so much more well-rounded and better-written than anyone imitating him, because he was created as an actual character. The rest are one note clichés.
DrRexMorman t1_itxlmks wrote
All the movies you mentioned also ripped off Conan the barbarian.
Also, Conan was the role that made Arnold a star.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments