The Godfather movies are so relaxing to watch.

Submitted by AndyKaufmanSentMe t3_123s8pd in movies

I could watch these characters for days, just drinking and eating and talking to each other. For all of the bloodshed and anger and vengeance in the Godfather movies, they're so relaxing to me.

Every scene feels just right in length, in tone, in the information is has to provide while still being entertaining. The stakes are always clear, but something unexpected always lurks around the corner. Every performer brings something wonderful and unique to their character that makes them endlessly watchable, even if they're a complete scumbag. Only through careful editing could something seem so carefree and dreamy.

Maybe it also helps that the cinematography is always warm and golden, or that the score sticks in my head for weeks, or that the movies just have a confidence about themselves that few have. "Having fun? We know you are. Stick around. This is the good part."

135

Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

smitemight t1_jdvzn66 wrote

It’s just a cosy wosy Mobster family.

81

MichaelMyers1980 t1_jdvzq4c wrote

I fully agree and years back I bought the special boxset with hours of cut scenes which I also love to watch lol Dialogue scenes are great when done right like in reservoir dogs etc. Do you also like the third movie?

27

chrisball96 t1_jdw0az0 wrote

I always thought that the parts of the first film where Michael is in hiding in Italy were so well-shot and beautiful. The contrast to the cramped confines of the city and all of its violence is so well-done, especially as that contrast evaporates in an instant and it all comes crashing down.

25

Kennymo95 t1_jdw0sr3 wrote

This sounds like something a Sopranos character would say

24

TheCosmicFailure t1_jdw1fjb wrote

I agree. Though I will say 1 and 3 are more cozy for me. It's hard to watch Michael push everybody away in 2. Though I will say it's relaxing watching Vitos rise to power.

20

Bumblesquatch_Prime t1_jdwhjdz wrote

Yeah every time I have tried to watch it I fall asleep before 30 minutes in.

I do not understand this movie, why it's so highly regarded, or half the people speaking in it. But... I'm glad you enjoy it and liked your post.

−1

TJzzz t1_jdwlctc wrote

..started watching them at work, really cool stuffs...glad the company has a vhs for some reason

3

notewithoutflaws t1_jdwogej wrote

The scene from the first where Michael kills the two guys before shipping off to Italy will always be one my favourite moments ever in movie history. I also much prefer the time after he returns from Italy and gets involved in the business.

Great movies for sure!

8

e-rage t1_jdwunoq wrote

It insists upon itself

1

twitch_delta_blues t1_jdwxom9 wrote

Yes, and I think it communicates the inherent contradiction within fascist social structures. Everyone wants peace (e.g. family) and prosperity -for themselves- and they’ll kill anyone that gets in the way or is currently in the way of that.

2

CosmicConjuror2 t1_jdx3i19 wrote

Replying to TheCosmicFailure (#2,394,966)

I’ve noticed that the films have a warmer tone when it focuses on Vito, or when Vito is still alive. Whereas when its focusing on Michael the movie starts feeling more cold and unromantic. A perfect reflection of their leadership and themselves.

13

CosmicConjuror2 t1_jdx3lip wrote

I don’t like rewatching movies too often but I watch the GF Trilogy every 2-3 months.

2

No-Faithlessness-366 t1_jdx4r2f wrote

The Godfather is one of the most revered movies of all time and its contribution to cinema is remarkable. This movie will make you intrigued by its astounding depiction of the mafia and immerse you into its world from the very start while being impressed by its technical and narrative aspects.

2

lovepuppy31 t1_jdx5lid wrote

Godfather is image of what the mob wants you to think who they are.

Goodfellas shows you what the mob on who they really are (loosely based on a real life mob associate Henry Hill and his time in the mob right?)

9

night_dude t1_jdxgk1z wrote

The scene where Clemenza teaches Michael how to make spaghetti and meatballs is one of my favourite parts. "Why don't you ever tell that nice girl you love her? Ohh, I love you with all-a my heart, if I don't-a see you again-a soon ima gonna diiieeee "

6

mdavis360 t1_jdxrmts wrote

It’s comfort food for sure. Goodfellas is the same way, funny enough.

2

JMPesce t1_jdxwil3 wrote

I stand by this to this day; The Godfather is the absolute greatest piece of American cinema in history. It isn't debatable; there is no other film as incredible, influential, or widely well received as The Godfather is. The behind the scenes trouble at Paramount while it was being made is also legendary. This film was destined to fail, and against all odds it succeeded. Truly lightning in a bottle; 2 is also great, but it pales in comparison to the original. While some would argue that it has a richer narrative, I would argue that making the movie much more political for 2 alienated some of the audience that truly loved 1, and detracted a bit of the sheen.

0

Seahearn4 t1_jdxxdl1 wrote

I love the character Tom Hagen (Robert Duvall), especially in the first one. I'm guessing he's intentionally made less likeable in Part 2, along with Michael getting the same treatment.

"Oh, that was an accident, Kay. (slightly laughing at the charred car frame) But nobody was hurt."

2

SharedPodwAdibisi t1_jdyg377 wrote

I've never made it through the first hour of the first one. It bores me to sleep.

−2

SwiftGasses t1_jdygd99 wrote

The last full day of my dogs life we sat with her and binged the trilogy. Made a good spaghetti with garlic bread and red wine.

Idk why the tone of Celebration and mourning for the day was punctuated perfectly by those movies. But I recommend it to anyone.

Made an awful day truly something nice and memorable.

3

Orange-Turtle-Power t1_jdyrc7e wrote

Amazing movies. If you haven’t seen it, I HIGHLY recommend you watch The Offer on paramount plus, which is literally about what it took to get the first movie made. Great series.

1

TheElbow t1_jdyupg9 wrote

I feel exactly the same. I watched The Godfather as the “Saga” cut on VHS tapes for the first time when I was around age 13. Not only is it amazing cinema, but I also feel like part 1 especially is a comfort movie. I could just watch them over and over.

1

Patsx5sb t1_jdz30hc wrote

Ya when I have 11 hours to spare

−2

MarcusXL t1_jdzf4wt wrote

Replying to JMPesce (#2,404,517)

1 and 2 are one long movie. It's the story of Michael Corleone trading his soul for power. He has his reasons-- very compelling ones. But nonetheless by the end of part 2, he has gone from tragic hero and prodigal son, to antihero, and finally to villain. To make that clear, you need part 2.

It's closer to Shakespeare or Greek Tragedy than the usual gangster flick.

2

MichaelMyers1980 t1_jdzmtc9 wrote

Replying to revconway (#2,400,033)

I did also have the VHS tapes back in the day but replaced them with dvd. I was just watching the cut scenes from part 2 where Michael is giving his blessings for marriage to good couples who come to see him but his sister he refuses as he can see her partner is crooked. Shows Michael is fair and a balanced thinker, these cut scenes really flesh out his character and gives a better context to some scenes in the movie

1

Bumblesquatch_Prime t1_je19kig wrote

Replying to camshell (#2,415,328)

I'm well aware of it's status and cultural impact. The only reason I've given it 4-ish tries is because of its clout.

Kind of has the same problem that Sons of Anarchy gives me. None of the characters, despite how well written they may be, are likable. If I can't find at least 1 character to identify or even sympathize with it's hard for me to keep interest. If the entire pool of characters ranges from "rat-bastard" to "evil genius" then I'm not gonna find it so great. I hate seeing bad people succeed, enough of that in real life for me to enjoy it as an unchallenged plot point in a movie/show/book.

With the Godfather trilogy I get that it's super highly regarded. And while I personally have no clue why after several attempts to watch and a lifetime of hearing references, I respect its impact on the entire film industry. Just not my cup of tea.

1

Bumblesquatch_Prime t1_je1ac8r wrote

Replying to MarcusXL (#2,412,168)

This is a very hostile way to shove your opinion in my face. I understand that this movie is very highly regarded, but it's just not a flavor I enjoy.

I don't like seeing horrible, bad, evil people get away with doing horrible, bad, evil things. There is enough of that in real life.

Your post has immediately reversed the other posts that made me think about giving it another shot. This smug self-righteous bullshit tells me more than enough about the type of people who like this movie with fervor. I want to be as little like you as possible.

2

MarcusXL t1_je1b08l wrote

Replying to Bumblesquatch_Prime (#2,423,418)

You didn't even watch the goddamned movie but you still talk shit about it. You're being ignorant. You don't even know what you're dismissing out of hand.

You're entitled to your opinion but that doesn't mean your opinion has any merit.

−1

Bumblesquatch_Prime t1_je1boea wrote

Replying to MarcusXL (#2,423,532)

"Every time I try to watch this movie".

Literally the first thing I said.

I've given this movie 4 attempts, set aside a few hours for it, and everything.

Notice how at the end of my post I didn't like... Trash OP for liking the movie?

Be like that, don't be a cunt because somebody doesn't enjoy some of the artwork you like. I think Picasso was a fucking troll, others think he was a genius. I don't want them to fucking die in a hole because I don't get their position/perspective.

0

Bumblesquatch_Prime t1_je1ek7f wrote

Replying to MarcusXL (#2,423,686)

Fair, 30 minutes is typically not enough time to get a feel for something, or perhaps I should have said "30 minutes after the title sequence".

I do understand that it IS highly regarded, but I do not understand WHY... Choosing what words mean to support your argument has drawbacks.

I also never said I didn't like the movie, I said I don't understand it. I like the movie just fine. See another thing you're intentionally ignoring is that it's so ingrained in cultural saturation that pieces of it get picked up on here and there.. I'm over 30 years old, people have talked about this movie my whole life. I know who 'Fredo is and what he does...

So even having a somewhat obscured "by proxy" knowledge of this movie, it didn't help. I often wonder if that's more reason why I can't get into it than not, but it's whatever. I don't think people are stupid for liking it, I just don't get their perspective. Maybe give me some of that instead of being a petty bully about it.

1

Bumblesquatch_Prime t1_je1exhp wrote

Replying to MarcusXL (#2,423,735)

Ah yes, because having a different style of taste immediately means I am an uncultured manchild.

Are you even capable of respecting anyone other than clones of yourself? You're one of the most self-righteous presumptuous cunts I have made the mistake of arguing with in some time.

Interesting you call other people out as childish when you literally cannot give some sort of "wisdom" without it being smothered in your superiority complex.

1

MarcusXL t1_je1mp6e wrote

Replying to Bumblesquatch_Prime (#2,424,120)

>I also never said I didn't like the movie, I said I don't understand it.

How can you understand a movie if you have only seen 30 minutes of it? It's a piece of art. You cannot say you know all about it by hearing about it second hand.

I didn't watch the movie until I was 30. I "knew" parts of it from references people made, but I had no idea what the movie was about until I actually watched the damned thing. The whole thing. It absolutely deserves its reputation as one of "the best movies ever made." There is no such thing as enjoying a complicated piece of art by proxy. But you'd have no idea why unless you watched it, and part 2 (but not part 3, which sucks).

1

MarcusXL t1_je1nwmo wrote

Replying to Bumblesquatch_Prime (#2,424,207)

My point is, some kind of movies offer instant gratification. Lasers, space-battles, non-stop action. They are fine for what they are.

Others are a slow burn, they demand close attention, they save their impact for later, once you understand the characters and the world they live in. They engage your intelligence, they challenge your sympathies and make you think about who you are, about morality, loyalty, and difficult choices people have to make. They have things to say about what it means to be human, to be a son, to be a father. It's the difference between forgettable pop-culture schlock and high art that sticks with you forever.

The first kind are childish, because children don't know how to delay gratification. They want the candy NOW, they want the toy NOW. Grown-ups should have learned that delaying gratification results in a better reward, and that the best things in life require some patience.

I don't have a superiority complex. Art is available to anyone who takes a moment to appreciate it. If you decide to miss out on it, it's nobody's fault but yours.

1

WolvoMS t1_je26s87 wrote

Replying to JMPesce (#2,404,517)

It insists upon itself, Lois.

But really, this movie has been on my radar since I was a kid when I saw the trailer hundreds of times on the Last Crusade VHS tape. But I've always had this block towards it, like I'd rather watch paint dry than watch The Godfather. I even bought the Blu Ray trilogy once and returned it before I opened it. Think I'll go grab it on 4k thanks to this thread. Decades of procrastination dies tonight!

2

logicalfallacy234 t1_je69yar wrote

Replying to MarcusXL (#2,412,189)

I actually think the best way to see Godfather (which is also my vote for greatest American film, over Kane, 2001, and Vertigo) is historical chronicle. If you want a similar movie/film, you could tell the story of the Syrian Civil War from the perspective of a single (preferably rich and powerful) family, or the story of the first 10 years of Vietnam after America left the country.

Even a biopic of like, someone like Lenin or Mao would replicate the feel and scale of The Godfather.

1

logicalfallacy234 t1_je6ak9o wrote

Replying to JMPesce (#2,431,272)

Interesting that you don't like Part 2 as much! Since I think yeah, I guess you respond to the aspect of Godfather that is a pure family epic, rather than a political epic/tragedy. As in, bizarrely enough, it's closer to Forrest Gump than Oliver Stone's Nixon.

1

logicalfallacy234 t1_je6as1o wrote

Replying to CosmicConjuror2 (#2,400,199)

How does Part III compare to the other 2 for you? Really happy to see people really enjoying Part III! Versus pretending it doesn't exist, which even Obama and Vince Gilligan have said that yeah, they pretend Part III never happened.

I really love Part III myself, so.

1

logicalfallacy234 t1_je6l2mz wrote

Replying to SharedPodwAdibisi (#2,457,175)

Intereeeeeeeeesting, since Kubrick is actually often seen as the slow and ponderous and boring director! Though the three Kubrick films you mentioned are much more "pop entertainment", if you will, than stuff like 2001 or Barry Lyndon.

Ari Aster is excellent though! And a huge Kubrick fan! Eggers is too, I believe.

But yeah, The Godfather is paced a lot more like War and Peace or Crime and Punishment or something like that. It's not a crime film like pop culture makes it out to be. Godfather is quite far away from the modern crime dramas on TV that it helped inspire.

1