[deleted] t1_jedbal9 wrote
I've heard theories that modern technology is one of the reasons a good number of big name filmmakers, since the 2000s, have pretty much stopped making films set in modern times.
Tarantino
Paul Thomas Anderson
Martin Scorsese
Wes Anderson
Spielberg
Coen Brothers
drveejai88 t1_jedocty wrote
Speilberg can adapt to moden times. If anyone can, it would be him. But I don't know. That's why he is restricting himself to period pieces i guess.
[deleted] t1_jedpkze wrote
Any of these directors could adapt to modern times if they wanted to. I think it's storytelling is just more natural when you don't have to explain away why no one isn't just texting each other the whole movie.
AlanMorlock t1_jeeuaur wrote
The Departed has a scene that hinges on someone being able to text inside their pocket.
[deleted] t1_jegisx9 wrote
Since the 2000s - Me
The Departed was 2006. So since then.
AlanMorlock t1_jeglhgp wrote
My point is, I don't think Scorsese is particularly avoidant of the story implications of texting. He's made period pieces since then but most of his films in the preceeding g 16 years were also period pieces. Not much of a change for him at all.
[deleted] t1_jegn5ox wrote
I wasn't talking specifically about Scorsese in the first place.
I was talking about a general trend.
wBuddha OP t1_jeg1ddx wrote
Ya, this is my point.
[deleted] t1_jegiiww wrote
And my point is storytelling is more natural when they don't have to.
AlanMorlock t1_jeet8fl wrote
People say this but most of them didn't really make many contemporary set films prior to smart phones either.
With Scorsese for instance in the 90s, he made 2 films thst were contemporary set, Cape Fear and Brigingout the dead, and 4 period pieces, Goodfellas, Casino, Age of Innocence and Kundun. Idlly enough hosn200s best picture winner includes a in-pocket T9 texting scene!
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments