This is a truly horrible post, and even worse take.

Screen time in Inception: -Tom Hardy - 12:45sec -Leo - 60:45sec

Granted, I’m the general sense, screen time means fk all in terms of performances (Anthony Hopkins won an Oscar for 16mins worth of screen time in Silence of the Lambs), but in the case of Inception. You’re never gonna convince Tom Hardy gave a better performance than Leo in a literal 1/4 of the amount of time on screen. Tom Hardy was an afterthought in that film, and Joseph Gordon Levitt. Just stfu rn lmfao. This dude gonna say Joseph Gordon Levitt > Leo DiCaprio and expect people to take their opinion’s seriously. Bro. Where do you get your drugs from?

Roast and stupidity aside.. ask yourself two questions

1. How many Leonardo DiCaprio movies have you seen?
2. When did you become aware of who Leonardo DiCaprio is, what role?

If someone with no prior knowledge of who he is, were to sit down and watch Leo films in chronological order. They would tell you how wrong your opinion is.

Look at the roles from these films:

• What’s Eating Gilbert Grape (93)
• Titanic (97)
• Gangs of New York (02)
• Revolutionary Road (08)
• The Great Gatsby (13)

5 films 5 years apart, most of them no where near his top work, tell me his performances and abilities aren’t “organic” for lack of better words.

“He’s a good actor with impressive filmography” … “he’s overrated” .. pick one