Submitted by laughinggas t3_11egxa4 in movies
[deleted] t1_jae4zok wrote
[deleted]
jbs1902 t1_jaehe12 wrote
It was a commercial success which is what matters
GetToSreppin t1_jaewohs wrote
It was also a critical success as well
mardal11 t1_jae9pd9 wrote
The books are a trilogy so it was to be expected. The two mains from the first movie are not the main characters in the second and third books. The second should focus on Gemma Chan's and Harry Shum Jr. characters while the third is much more and ensemble.
squeakyL t1_jaeil2h wrote
The two mains from the movie aren't the mains in the first book either really. But it made a lot more sense to focus the movie down and their pov probably was the most straight forward.
The 2nd and 3rd books get a bit too ridiculous for me. I enjoyed the first movie but the source material for 2/3 and the long delay in production might be an issue.
Beginning-Call1641 t1_jae8beg wrote
I agree
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments