I agree with you. 3D is about that added depth. It’s makes an object in the foreground such as a Coke can visually interesting but if it where in 2D when everything is flat, your eye skips over it. Some people would call that distracting from the scene, but when I was in Art class my teacher taught me that by adding items such as different color variations of white at strategic points I could control where the viewer starts, moves around, and ends in my painting. I feel 3D brings that control for the director. It makes the artwork more exciting. I do feel that the intention needs to be a 3D movie from the start or a past movie that can be converted where the technology wasn’t there at the time but 3D would add to it visually. I also understand wearing glasses can be uncomfortable but to me the experience of 3D is worth it and I love it. I would like to see 3 really high quality 3D movies a year as to not over due the experience factor and not converted to try and make an extra buck.