Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Potatoswatter t1_j1u2olv wrote

You just claimed that DDR5 SDRAM isn’t faster than magnetic core memory. Then you moved the starting point from core memory to mid-80’s DRAM, a completely different thing. Then gave the state of the art as 100ns when it’s more like 25ns if you stop to search. Then you still came up with 3x improvement in contradiction to the first sentence.

2

tokynambu t1_j1u53d8 wrote

That's a fair comment: I was comparing with the 80s, not the 70s.

However, I don't see how you get "Then gave the state of the art as 100ns" when I explicitly wrote "Today synchronous memory has a first word latency of the order of 10ns;"

1