Submitted by Matchooojk t3_121ugc4 in mildlyinteresting
Comments
NinjaLanternShark t1_jdnj40o wrote
To be fair, the truck will hold, haul, and tow a lot more; plus can handle a much wider variety of road (or non-road) conditions.
The question isn't whether the truck is more capable, it's whether the owner ever uses any of those capabilities.
Aldoine t1_jdnstac wrote
They do not use those capabilities the vast majority of the time.
I truly believe the truck trend is the single worst thing that has happened in the last twenty years, strictly from a environmental stand point.
I also believe there is no reason for people to spend 450-650 a month on a truck they don't need.
Edit: this is a direct quote from a study done by strategic vision.
"According to Edwards’ data, 75 percent of truck owners use their truck for towing one time a year or less (meaning, never). Nearly 70 percent of truck owners go off-road one time a year or less. And a full 35 percent of truck owners use their truck for hauling"
Lsvtecb16a t1_jdnvcv3 wrote
People buy trucks to use them knowingly that they will be doing some sort of hauling or off-roading… You will never know when you need a truck until your car can’t fit a dresser or tow a trailer lol.
Aldoine t1_jdnvr84 wrote
Yes and the vast majority of people don't ever use them for those purposes. 75 percent of truck owners only use their truck for towing/hauling something other than grocery's 1 time or less a year.
Lorentz_Prime t1_jdo8ea2 wrote
Where did you find that information?
Aldoine t1_jdshu1n wrote
From the strategic vision study
ScarletDarkstar t1_jdp0v9h wrote
I'm curious where they derived that information. I wouldn't be surprised if people in large cities rarely haul much, but where I live that's got to be about opposite. I'm on the road with trucks pulling horse trailers every day, beds loaded with welders and equipment. 75% of the trucks I see are regularly used for their intended purposes.
Aldoine t1_jdshru2 wrote
It's definitely different in more rural environments. I live in Vegas and most vehicles in the roads are massive trucks that are just pleasure vehicles.
Atomaardappel t1_jdo95kq wrote
I have a truck for those things. I also have a small, fuel efficient car for the other 95% of my driving. My truck is 20 years old and has 85k miles. It doesn't make sense to use a truck as a daily unless you haul/tow daily. The gas savings alone has more than paid for my car, not to mention repairs and maintenance costs on a truck are much higher.
nerevisigoth t1_jdple5o wrote
Looks like a 4th generation Ram 1500 and a 3rd generation Miata. They actually get almost exactly the same MPG ratings, but the truck can carry more people and cargo.
Capybara_King47 t1_jdppb4k wrote
Well, yeah, but truck big, truck masculine. How else will man assert dominance but with truck?
Atomaardappel t1_jdo9g1h wrote
Here is my Miata sized Honda next to a big truck that wanted to show how cool he was by taking up 3 spaces. https://imgur.com/a/HDqq5mK
Mysterious-Salad5362 t1_jdnol0k wrote
Miata
Is
Always
The
Answer
[deleted] t1_jdnjttk wrote
[deleted]
ScarletDarkstar t1_jdp09tf wrote
That's not a giant truck, it's a fairly average sized truck, isn't it?
rammo123 t1_jdp9cmh wrote
By American standards. For 95% of the population that’s a giant truck.
aehanken t1_jdpab0f wrote
To be fair, if you’re in Europe trucks are hardly a thing. My Swedish family thought it was crazy coming to America and seeing trucks everywhere.
In places like Italy it’s not feasible with many roads there.
BallsDeepInADragon t1_jdnf766 wrote
And yet both of these cars probably do the exact the same thing.