Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

dadbod001 t1_ja5w1lf wrote

I guess Korean food labeling laws are similar to us- <5 calories/serving=0

If anyone was curious, all zero calorie sodas/energy drinks/etc have some non zero calories, a trivial amount.

25

Jocks_Strapped t1_ja5gpi4 wrote

because you will burn 8 calories lifting the can

10

unitratio t1_ja5xs1q wrote

translations cause nobody asked:

milkis zero

i love you milkis zero

8

moms-spaghettio t1_ja5g3x4 wrote

You’ll find this even more mildly interesting: even diet and zero calorie drinks that claim to have 0 calories have some calories. They’re able to get away with marketing it as that because the amount of calories it has is less than 1. A more accurate calorie label for those would be <1 cal.

4

chrimminimalistic t1_ja5nhhc wrote

The zeroes are just doing cheerleading and accidentally forming an 8.

2

Mistapeepers t1_ja61hux wrote

I bet if you look at the serving size it’ll say two servings per can. If I recall correctly you’re allowed to round down on calories so the total is always an increment of five. Therefore anything under five calories is legally rounded down to zero calories.

2

CompletelyPresent t1_ja5imf5 wrote

Hey, it let's you float around on clouds apparently, must be pretty good.

1

DarthAlfie t1_ja70dbk wrote

You burn more than 8 calories drinking it.

It’s why celery is actually negative calories; takes more energy to eat than it provides.

1

Chaseism t1_ja7eoq3 wrote

This is actually quite common even in the states. If your food has below a certain amount of calories, but more than zero, you can still call it a zero-calorie food.

1

matt6342 t1_ja7jmx0 wrote

3.2 per 100ml is allowed to be rounded to 0

1

SageTegan t1_ja74ri3 wrote

some calories is healthier than no calories. There's still loads of artificial sweeteners in it though. Enjoy! :)

−1