Submitted by demigodxl t3_11e9nc5 in mildlyinteresting
Comments
Base_T t1_jacur7l wrote
it's mandatory for most countries to make, even if it's ridiculously simple like this one
IllustriousSignal575 t1_jacvo7i wrote
We gotta put warning labels on hot coffee....that people specifically order, this shouldn't surprise you lol.
demigodxl OP t1_jacvprn wrote
It even identifies the cable, it was idiot proof lol
tezoatlipoca t1_jacxmkq wrote
End users have a funny way of continuously challenging one's notion of "idiot".
Superbob88 t1_jacxyti wrote
If you make something idiot proof the universe will create a more powerful idiot.
Superbob88 t1_jacyb4c wrote
That coffee story is 100% messed up. That McDonald's had repeatedly been using dangerously high temperature drinks. Like way above safety, and the lady just asked for them to help cover medical bills. They refused to so she sued them, and rightfully so.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liebeck_v._McDonald%27s_Restaurants
Edited to give reference.
Ilovesoske t1_jaczoh4 wrote
I am surprised that it doesn't also indicate that it's an in/out USB as well.
austinll t1_jad38qc wrote
I'm confused. Is it USB A Male or Female?
IllustriousSignal575 t1_jad6fj1 wrote
That McDonald's? It was a lot more than just that McDonalds. There were hundreds of cases of hot coffee burns each year by that point, hers was just the one that got full coverage and everything it got due some specifics. Her case was not uncommon at the time though, not even close to uncommon.
Superbob88 t1_jad6vzc wrote
It was just the one that blow up the information about the dangerously hot coffee.
bpwelcome7 t1_jad7h09 wrote
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
IllustriousSignal575 t1_jad7tbt wrote
Yes, however let me explain some smaller not widely known facts of the case.
She was actually against the lawsuit and only wanted her medical bills to be paid for. Thanks to the up and coming media age, she got way more.
The end problem is that hot coffee generally has to be brewed between 175-195F, but it also has to be served between 150-170F iirc. A Keurig, for example, spits coffee out at 195.
Then we come into the issue of workload during breakfast hours, fast food having their timers for how quickly someone goes through their drivethrough, etc.
Travellingjake t1_jad8kob wrote
Superbob88 t1_jad91bf wrote
Yeah I know this, that's why I shared the link. The people aren't the monsters it the corporations. The woman who sued her nephew for breaking her ankle at his birthday party. She was forced to sue the insurance company who refused to do the one thing they are supposed to do and they forced her to name the nephew because it was his birthday party or something like that.
IllustriousSignal575 t1_jad9qqk wrote
I think it's more of a combination of shit corporations and shit people. There are shit corporations who dont care about people, and there are shit people who regularly seek out weaknesses in a corporation in order to file an easy lawsuit for easy money. Then we have the select few who are USDA Certified Stupid and think you can drink bleach or shove a tampon soaked in alcohol up your ass and not have anything bad happen to you, those guys, theyre the ones we have to have warning labels for in all reality.
Edit: not saying old lady was a dumbass, her situation was the definition of an accident.
ZeeLiDoX t1_jadcu0j wrote
I work in electronics... You'd be surprised at how dumb people really are.
lorddoa t1_jadgh7x wrote
If you make something idiot proof, only an idiot will be able to use it
hughdint1 t1_jadoytk wrote
People who complain about the McDonald"s hot coffee issue obviously never got McDonald's Coffee at that time. It was ridiculously hot for like an hour after you bought it. Way too hot for coffee, or anything that is meant for sale to the public let alone to pour into your mouth. That woman got 2nd & 3rd degree burns from a liquid! Let that sink in.
hughdint1 t1_jadq141 wrote
I knew someone that got hurt as a passenger in a car accident. They told the driver not to worry because they had great medical insurance.
The passenger's health insurance company sued the drivers car insurance company, who then sued the driver, because the medical bills were over the limit of the auto insurance liability.
Superbob88 t1_jadqtqo wrote
American health care in a nutshell.
tezoatlipoca t1_jacup98 wrote
As a technical writer, I can assure you that at least a dozen of these were returned with the excuse of "I thought it was USB-C"