Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

IdiotRedditAddict t1_iu6w4aq wrote

Reply to comment by Lucavious in its annoying bro by RedPanda_2882

I'm confused, who is being subjected to a fetish without consent?

3

Lucavious t1_iu6wayt wrote

Everyone who isn’t wearing the fur suit.

0

IdiotRedditAddict t1_iu6wtdi wrote

When? Where? How? At furry conventions for other furries that are by definition not doing that? Furry internet spaces that are by definition not doing that?

Are you under the completely false impression that furries usually just wear their fursuits/fursonas in their every day life? To school and work and the bank and such?

Also, I'm not a furry or in the furry community at all, but even I understand the basic fact that it isn't a sexual fetish for all of them, and that there's nothing inherently sexual about wearing a fursuit.

0

Lucavious t1_iu6xajl wrote

Do you think this works?

Just pretending everyone’s experience with furries in public is imaginary and hoping acceptance comes along?

1

IdiotRedditAddict t1_iu6xmay wrote

I'm honestly legitimately asking to what you are referring. As a non-furry who has literally never seen a furry in public, and certainly never seen a furry being overtly sexual in public, I don't know what the fuck you're taking about.

A single source or even just personal anecdote would be cool.

2

Lucavious t1_iu6xvoc wrote

Okay guy who isn’t a furry but for some reason is weirdly obsessed with defending furries.

−1

idunnohonestly- t1_iu6y5e8 wrote

Ok look, not to choose sides, but your argument kinda sucks. You’re making the claim here, you need to back it up.

2

IdiotRedditAddict t1_iu70gc7 wrote

You wanna know my perspective? My bias? I'm personally pretty vanilla with a light BDSM leaning, my older sister is a member of erotic fanfiction spaces, and so my general tilt towards 'fetishes' and 'fetish cultures' is not to judge.

Sex crimes against children or animals are terrible. They're rape.

But I also know that 'they are/shelter pedos' and 'they shelter are/zoophiles' is the oldest fucking false equivalence playbook used on every 'fetishist' and 'deviant' that puritanical religious 'moralists' have deemed 'impure'.

So, you want to tell furries they should be ashamed? Condemn them for subjecting others to their kink non-consensually? Give me a reason.

I think displaying your kink non-consensually is bad. But I need you to help me understand that the community as a whole is largely guilty of that? Because I've not heard that that is the case.

1

Lucavious t1_iu733di wrote

gif

0

IdiotRedditAddict t1_iu75ob6 wrote

Cool, glad to know you had no point/argument an were just spreading hate for fun.

0

Lucavious t1_iu79eba wrote

Did you think this was an argument?

You need help. That’s all.

0

IdiotRedditAddict t1_iu7cec8 wrote

"You think this is an argument?"

Yes, I think this is argumentative: "Furries making their routine attempt to shed the shame of their fetish without actually changing anything about their subjecting other people to it without their consent."

You made an argumentative claim, and I simply, politely, asked you support that claim in literally any way, which you didn't.

You say I need help? Did I say something unhealthy? Unhinged? Please point out what I said that warrant 'help', and maybe also tell me about your psychiatric credentials to make that assessment while you're at it.

1