Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Lumploader t1_jeekkdd wrote

Bro this is a whack take. You must be a tankie

10

Antiquemooses t1_jeeknd2 wrote

republicans calling peoples tankies is so weird, its like if they started calling gay people closet cases because they heard gay people calling each other that, and now they're all just using it wrong in unison.

−2

EffectiveSwan8918 t1_jeemf3i wrote

Tankies has a definition. Tankies are far from liberal. Op is a tankie or an ass

10

Ok-Organization5864 t1_jeemre9 wrote

woke means that they overly praise lgbt

from what i know, take this with a grain of salt

2

Lumploader t1_jeemrzt wrote

"Tankie is a pejorative label for leftists, particularly Stalinists, who support the authoritarian tendencies of Marxism–Leninism or, more generally, authoritarian states associated with Marxism–Leninism in history."

I wouldn't consider that synonymous with "woke" from any direction of the political spectrum

14

Critical-Ad-7094 t1_jeeo6ds wrote

You could probably add a few extra arms in there with "bigot", "racist", "homophobe", "transphobe" and "terf" on then... and that's only a few words I've seen tossed around in the last year or so to try and discredit anyone and everyone who people may not agree with. About anything.

−2

Critical-Ad-7094 t1_jeeosxs wrote

Ohh I see you're actually an ideologue, sorry i didn't realise you were just spouting nonsense instead of something informative. And no, those terms aren't being used properly by their definition. The fact you won't believe someone when they say the USSR killed X amount of people, by definition, makes you a bigot. So just gonna leave you with that and not care to interact with you further.

3

Critical-Ad-7094 t1_jeeq7yr wrote

How so exactly?

And yes, when people use a term incorrectly as much as has been done in recent years, it does lose meaning. To the point where people believe racism means "race and power" when in years past it just meant race. So how am I the ideologue here or are you using the "No, U" argument?

1

turndownforwomp t1_jeeqh29 wrote

No; the vast majority of people understand that “racism” means “racial prejudice”. What you’re claiming is simply factually incorrect, the word is used clearly, properly, and effectively all the time. Leave your internet echo chamber and talk to normal people for a little while, you’ll realize your claim is nonsense.

1

Critical-Ad-7094 t1_jeeqido wrote

bigot noun big·​ot ˈbi-gət Synonyms of bigot : a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices

Sounds quite intolerant to not believe others when they tell you facts, doesn't it? Sounds like youre quite devoted to that position, yes? Bigotry 101.

3

Critical-Ad-7094 t1_jeeqzhp wrote

Ohhh so now we shift the goalposts in our favour. I mean when a someone on the other side of the political aisle makes a claim that you can't factually counter, they're a bigot. But ehe you make a claim you can factually counter, you're not a bigot?

2

turndownforwomp t1_jeer88w wrote

You’re an ideologue because your desire to dismiss all of these words clearly comes from political and social positions that incline you to dismiss any and all uses of those words. They’re not meaningless, you just want to claim that so you never have to respond to anyone pointing out that something may be racist or bigoted. “Those words don’t really mean anything” is a cop out from someone who hasn’t touched grass in a while

1

Chronic_Sardonic t1_jees0b1 wrote

…this is a word salad. No one is a bigot for disagreeing with your claims, even if you can find one mouth breather who uses the term that way. No goalposts have been moved.

I’m starting to think what you actually meant was “I am dumb and don’t know the definition of these words so I assume it’s not important”

1

turndownforwomp t1_jeesu6a wrote

It’s pretty telling that you keep responding but can’t defend yourself against the points I’ve made.

Obviously this is a softball argument because, i have said, the words do have established meanings the majority of us agree on and you trying to calming otherwise is a joke but it’s still fun

1

Critical-Ad-7094 t1_jeet188 wrote

You can keep saying all you want, but you're just coming off as quite the fool. And I'm happy to indulge such foolish behaviour, but I'm not arguing with you because you're shouting in to a void and it's funny to watch such futility.

1

turndownforwomp t1_jeet81q wrote

If you’re not going to keep defending your stupid claim that words don’t have meanings I’m done here. Since you’re not defending it, and it was so stupid to begin with, I’ll just take this W and hope you learn critical thinking someday.

1

turndownforwomp t1_jeetl4o wrote

Words have definitions, bro. I’m right, you’re wrong. Everyone knows what racist and bigot and all those other words you listed mean and they’re used correctly all the time. Your claim was stupid, mine is just observable truth.

0

turndownforwomp t1_jeeu0j2 wrote

I’m sure you’ve heard people tell you you’re wrong many times since the playground, especially given your opinion on how words work. I can’t imagine you’ve ever gotten a good grade on an essay with your particular approach to the English language

1

Chronic_Sardonic t1_jeeuj7p wrote

>if you can’t see that

See what? People using words like “racist” correctly the majority of the time.

If they have clear definitions, your claim that they no longer have clear definitions is BS. That’s it, that’s all, you contradicted yourself.

0

Critical-Ad-7094 t1_jeevspi wrote

Never said it was meaningless you moron, I said it was used as a buzzword that lost all definition. Calling someone who doesn't agree with you a bigot renders the word meaningless. If you can't see that yet you really don't belong in this conversation lmao

1

Critical-Ad-7094 t1_jeew46u wrote

Because it was never ajiht a word having a definite meaning in the first place, it was about the use of the word rendering it meaningless. OP thinks the term Tankie has become synonymous with an abstract view of leftist politics that the word is thrown around without proper nuance. Just as I believe the terms I've listed have become.

If you failed to grasp this concept then that's on you.

2

Chronic_Sardonic t1_jeewhaz wrote

I know you’d like me to do that but unlike you I can defend my opinion allllllll day. I’m home sick from work and I can continue to tell you why what you said was stupid until it actually gets through that thick little skull of yours

1

Critical-Ad-7094 t1_jeewqnf wrote

I mean,.odds are, you don't actually work at all. Most ideologues like yourself don't. You can keep repeating what you've already posted but it just highlights how dumb you are.

You can or not, I dont care, it would just make it easier on yourself and probably your therapist if you admit to it before long.

1

Critical-Ad-7094 t1_jeex1lw wrote

Is that so? OK explain it further for me. Get really into it. Like I mean, write a massive essay about it and when you FINALLY realise I don't care what your opinion is you'll finally understand why im confident in what I've already stated.

1

Chronic_Sardonic t1_jeex53h wrote

I’ll tell you what; if you can competently and persuasively explain in one comment your argument and why you’re correct I’ll give you gold. Give me the best summary of your claims you can and if it genuinely makes sense I will admit error.

1

Critical-Ad-7094 t1_jeextdk wrote

As inside, I dont care enough to prove you wrong, to show you why youre wrong or even care if you admit error. You can do whatever you want, DILLIGAF.

You'll give me gold? What the fuck is gold? Something special im meant to care about?

1

rikispainish t1_jegls42 wrote

Woke is dead ass just any combination of anti-Herero, anti-male, anti-white with a dash victim worship and self victimization

1