JaesopPop t1_j1e5vy9 wrote
Reply to comment by SheeEttin in Mass. State Police to set up sobriety checkpoint starting Thursday in Bristol County by LackingUtility
They didn’t say they had a constitutional right to drive.
SheeEttin t1_j1e6fec wrote
Is there a scenario other than driving where you'd hit one of these checkpoints and get pulled over?
JaesopPop t1_j1e6mxa wrote
Than driving? No, but that doesn’t mean that person was saying anyone had a constitutional right to drive lmao
SheeEttin t1_j1e9zib wrote
What constitutional right would it violate, then?
JaesopPop t1_j1ecias wrote
You can re-read their comment and engage with them if you’re confused I’m just informing you that they didn’t say anyone had a constitutional right to drive
alongfield t1_j1ecp8l wrote
The 4th.
Sobriety checkpoints only get away with being constitutional if they stop every single vehicle. If cops use any discretion about which car to stop, then it's illegal.
LackingUtility OP t1_j1epviw wrote
Yep. Technically, random stops work too - every 4th car, or "we flip a coin", or something similar, as long as the cops aren't using their discretion.
SheeEttin t1_j1fbbkd wrote
Is that not what they're doing?
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments