Submitted by Tara_is_a_Potato t3_zt1zuc in massachusetts
TheDancingRobot t1_j1c9eqb wrote
Is the movie good, or just a rehash of the same story?
YeaItsBig4L t1_j1cg2k4 wrote
It doesn’t matter, it’s the most visually stunning thing that’s ever been on a movie screen. And you only get to experience it this one time until whatever release. Just do yourself a favor and go see it. Stop relying on other people’s opinions to drive yours
TheDancingRobot t1_j1cjbq0 wrote
Thankfully comments (opinions) never could. But I do appreciate reading how people react to massively complex initiatives put forth and how they do so in singular sentences - plus the rhetoric they use based on assumptions. It's entertaining to read.
YeaItsBig4L t1_j1cjt8o wrote
Yeah whatever, go see it.
TheDancingRobot t1_j1ckeea wrote
Did you like the story? Or was it just rehashed? Just curious.
GaleTheThird t1_j1diusv wrote
It was pretty straightforward but well executed. Better then the story in the first one but the visuals are definitely still a bigger draw
YeaItsBig4L t1_j1ckmy2 wrote
Think about it this way. How many iterations of a chocolate chip cookie are there? Hundreds of thousands? So no this movie didn’t invent a new cookie. It’s a chocolate chip cookie. But it’s the most delicious chocolate chip cookie I’ve ever had.
DinkandDrunk t1_j1dtupz wrote
It does matter though. I’m not going to go see a movie I won’t like because it looks pretty.
YeaItsBig4L t1_j1dubx8 wrote
Hey man, that’s cool. I like movies and right now the most visually stunning movie to ever exist is in movie theaters on giant screens. I didn’t feel like missing that. But if you want to then hey that’s cool man.
DinkandDrunk t1_j1dv1fp wrote
The visuals on the last Avatar aged like milk. Visually pretty is not a very compelling reason to see a movie if it’s the only reason you can come up with.
YeaItsBig4L t1_j1dvi1u wrote
I really hope it’s some point in your life you realize your opinion is not a fact. Because I can go on YouTube or any other thread. Or I could just literally link you to a video with 1 million views on it that says avatar aged incredibly well visually. So what makes your opinion more valid than that? And again opinion. visually pretty is enough for I and millions and millions of other people to see it apparently or else it wouldn’t have the number that it has.
DinkandDrunk t1_j1dw55e wrote
You’re acting like it’s a crime against film not to see this movie and the only reason you can provide is that it’s visually appealing. Have you considered that some people rank visuals lower on their priorities for how they spend 3 hours of their lives than you do? I understand what I say is an opinion. My opinion. In my opinion, I won’t like this movie and I don’t think CGI ages very well. So I won’t bother going to see it. You can feel free to go see it and I hope it’s been everything you expected. But you’re weirdly judgmental of people not wanting to go see the pretty blue people.
YeaItsBig4L t1_j1dwfz4 wrote
I’m not gonna lie, I don’t care about your opinion on this topic enough to read any of that. You can fool yourself into thinking I did. We’re talking about a movie I like. There’s nothing you can say that’s going to change that so at the end of the day it doesn’t really matter
DinkandDrunk t1_j1dwzfk wrote
I’m not trying to change your mind, doofus.
YeaItsBig4L t1_j1dxci7 wrote
GaleTheThird t1_j1fs7ny wrote
>The visuals on the last Avatar aged like milk.
Have you seen it recently at all? The release a month or two ago was visually fantastic
gkaminsky013 t1_j1db682 wrote
What’s so visually stunning about it? Honest question
YeaItsBig4L t1_j1djnaf wrote
I’m really not about to sit here and try to explain to you, what literally everybody is saying about this movie, even people that seem to hate it cannot deny that it is visually breathtaking. For three hours. Just go see it dude it’s a movie not surgery
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments