Submitted by Clollin t3_zq9wuf in massachusetts

I have a peculiar fixation with sidewalks, and I notice that while sidewalks in Boston and even smaller cities are good now, it's almost never that a sidewalk gets repaved in the suburbs.

Not just sidewalks, but roads and parking lots rarely get repaved, and are usually in bad condition.

More broadly, it seems like nothing good is opening in the suburbs anymore.

Sure, people still live there. They have to live somewhere, and they'll even pay up the wazoo for a nice house. But the surrounding area typically hasn't been invested in much in decades. It's best days are behind it.

I apologize if this post comes across as slightly emotional rather than objective. Hopefully it at least gets the conversation started. I know some of my perception of the world is driven by my own mental health quirks rather than by objective reality. Hence I'm here to get other people's opinions.

(I also want to say that some suburbs are nicer than others. Like, Milton is very nice, for example. But even Milton probably has more cracked asphalt than fresh concrete on the ground. ((Western states and some MA cities use concrete sidewalks.)) I know that's partially a weather thing, but I don't think it's exclusively a weather thing.)

Thanks. Please be nice.

0

Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

squarerootofapplepie t1_j0x1fgc wrote

Can people be more specific than just saying suburbs? Municipal government means every town is a little different.

55

MoonlessPrairie t1_j0x6koh wrote

Hard to respond to sweeping generalizations of suburbs. In general, most suburbs i drive thru are in good shape fwiw.

30

LowkeyPony t1_j0x5f9y wrote

My mother still lives in my hometown on the South Shore, in a suburb of Boston.

The sidewalks, and roads are in decent shape. There have been several small business's that have opened up over the last 10 years. There's the commuter rail into Boston. They recently been updating the water/sewer lines, and then actually repaving the streets. AND adding sidewalks. My sister lives in a town further away from Boston, but still a suburb. And the town is clean, has decent roads, schools, shopping and sidewalks.

I am often on the North and South Shore suburbs for business. And no, the "suburbs" of Boston are not dying. And there's been plenty of investments in them. *smh*

14

winter-teeth t1_j0xc6cd wrote

What’s your reference point here? What town hasn’t had the “surrounding area updated in decades”?

As an example, Woburn just had a whole dead mall torn down and replaced with a modern shopping center, with restaurants and stuff. It’s always busy.

14

blup12 t1_j0x3pid wrote

Sidewalks? TLDR

7

nonitalic t1_j0xdcbq wrote

I don't think this is broadly true in Massachusetts, but it is true in many states, largely due to the fact that suburbs are a ponzi scheme.

7

Clollin OP t1_j0xfhcf wrote

I think it's more true in Massachusetts than other states (WA, GA). Great video btw.

I think the suburbs I saw in WA and GA were newer and still in the growth phase described in your video. Massachusetts suburbs are older, with surfaces paved with flimsy asphalt instead of durable concrete for whatever reason, so they're in the decay state where the town can't afford to repair them imho, if the video's thesis is correct.

−7

nonitalic t1_j0xlc4h wrote

Depends on where you go. Massachusetts's overall wealth means that tax revenues are higher than most states, which helps a lot. Our suburbs are older, sure, but whether a town was built in 1780 or 1880 isn't going to have a big impact on modern infrastructure. I don't know where you went in Georgia, but most suburbs in the South don't have sidewalks at all outside commercial areas.

I don't mind asphalt sidewalks as long as they're maintained, and on sidewalks asphalt can last a surprisingly long time as long as the trees don't get to it.

7

TheTechOcogs t1_j0z3q7f wrote

Massachusetts towns also have a cycle of freezing and thawing that really accelerates this problem

7

NoMoLerking t1_j0xji95 wrote

People move to the suburbs for schools. If the sidewalk is lumpy I think that’s okay.

5

Parallax34 t1_j0xrj53 wrote

What's even an example of a "suburb you're talking about? Malden absolutely redid many concrete sidewalks while I was there, and has rebuilt their entire downtown in the last 6 years or so. Wellesley has great sidewalks, many concrete, mostly with granite curbs; the city even plows all the sidewalks in the winter. Somerville seems to have sidewalks at least as nice as Boston, if not nicer and many large projects going on like Assembly. Lexington is redoing their entire town center, and cutting down all the trees in doing so 😢. The list can go on and on. I can't think of a suburb in the Boston metro that even anecdotally supports your hypothesis.

5

Clollin OP t1_j0xyhot wrote

Doxxing myself, but I live in Canton and was primarily thinking of Stoughton and Rt. 138 when I made my post.

−4

Parallax34 t1_j0y0wwo wrote

Don't know a lot about Stoughton in particular, or if they would even have many sidewalks. I think I may have only been out there in recent years for Ikea. My impression is it's quite far out, so being quiet is likely expected. They did construct a brand new $126M dollar high school finished in 2020 though. With 55M coming from the state, along the lack of investment claim they seem to be getting investment!

5

bubalusarnee t1_j0yee2l wrote

It's not too late to edit your post and put Stoughton in wherever you said suburbs.

It sure would help with getting your point about Stoughton across.

5

Clollin OP t1_j116731 wrote

It's not like I haven't been to other suburbs on all sides of Boston. I think they're all pretty similar, with only minor quirks/variations.

0

throwawaysscc t1_j11laxp wrote

138 is a minor “stroad”. It hasn’t really changed since the 70’s. Cars darting here, there and everywhere.

1

EnergeticAlmond t1_j0xhxly wrote

I drive through Natick on 27 all the time. They just redid a huge section of side walk on both sides. Completely replaced granite curbs for over a mile. Anecdotal but... So is this post.

The main artery into my neighborhood was also newly repaved last year...

4

movdqa t1_j0x8at3 wrote

My mother died recently and she left a 4 bedroom house in a Boston suburb to her 7 grandchildren. Our job is to decide what to do with it as there is some interest in the grandkids to keep it. There is no real pressure on a timeframe. The house isn't in great shape but it is in a great location and neighborhood. It would likely be a teardown because it was built in the 1920s and people with the money to buy it want modern infrastructure.

My understanding is that this is happening a lot in the Boston suburbs. One nice thing about the Boston suburbs is that people living in the area want good schools and will fund them. But they won't necessarily pay for other stuff that can be put off.

We live in NH and the thing that stops us from buying the place is the age and MA taxes. I go down once or twice a week to maintain the place as does a sister that lives nearby.

3

bubalusarnee t1_j0ye7z4 wrote

I moved to the suburbs about 5 years ago. Since then there has been a sidewalk installed for about all of the two miles from here to the town center. The town center and the road all the way along have been regraded and then repaved with improvements made to stormwater control, there are new crosswalks and other traffic controls, and the shopping center there has also just been repaved.

I am thinking that you have seen what you have seen, but there are 50 or so communities that can each be called a suburb, and they are each in a different place and heading in a different direction. You did not describe the suburb I live in really at all.

3

ak47workaccnt t1_j0yhprf wrote

Tewksbury got a bunch of money from the state to redo their sidewalks and they don't even have anything worth walking to.

3

Hilarias_Glucose_Cup t1_j0x8jch wrote

Sidewalks seem fine in the suburbs I travel in. 🤷‍♂️

2

EtonRd t1_j0xfu3b wrote

It does sound like your perception is not 100% clear. The suburbs are fine. Been living here for many years. There is natural wear and tear on all roads and sidewalks. Upkeep and repair takes time and money. And there’s never enough of either.

2

savory_thing t1_j0ydpit wrote

What you describe doesn’t match up with what I see in reality.

2

plawwell t1_j0ys6j2 wrote

You need to clear snow from the sidewalk outside you house. That's why people hate them.

2

Clollin OP t1_j115vl7 wrote

Where I live, the town has always cleared sidewalks.

0

dny6 t1_j0z6xhw wrote

I mean, the suburbs are full of people who hate taxes and don't want to live in a city but paradoxically want city services. There is never enough revenue to pay for all the upkeep.

2

frankybling t1_j107ak0 wrote

where I live we don’t have sidewalks in 85% of our town. Roads are pretty shabby too. No businesses. Taxes are nice and high though. It’s great! /s

2

pinklemonade7 t1_j10rsmu wrote

I know what you mean. Sidewalks and roads are typically shitty here. I’ve lived in many other states (south, north, west), and cities like Buffalo and Chicago suburbs despite heavy snow and being quite old do not have crappy pothole laden and cracked/overgrown intermittent sidewalks. But I don’t think this is an indication of suburbs dying. People think these streets and sidewalks are normal, it’s not uncommon to see an old frail person walking/little kids biking/strollers on the street along heavy traffic even though it gives me a ton of anxiety over safety issues.

2

Clollin OP t1_j117grl wrote

>People think these streets and sidewalks are normal

That's exactly what I'm seeing in this thread. I mean, it's all relative: Certain third-world countries have even worse roads than Massachusetts, perhaps by far. But most of the US that I've seen has much better roads and sidewalks. As do places as diverse as Japan, Moscow (sorry, showing my Russian troll roots here. I'm reformed, I swear.), etc.

0

-Horatio_Alger_Jr- t1_j1aaaw7 wrote

>But most of the US that I've seen has much better roads and sidewalks.

Yet we pay the second highest rate for road work in the country (140k a mile).

1

Clollin OP t1_j1bq2u2 wrote

I believe that's due to higher labor wages. Which are probably a good thing. But may also be one of the reasons the roads can't get repaved.

1

-Horatio_Alger_Jr- t1_j1cww2q wrote

There was a study done that I read earlier this year that showed that we do have higher than nation average wages, but it wasn't that much higher than the national average. One of the states (in the Midwest I think) pay around 20k a mile and have wages sitting 7-17% higher than the national average.

The 3 highest cost per mile states are NJ at 200k, MA at 145k, and HI at 86k (i think that was the number).

I will have to look for the article again (I will link it to you if I have time to find it), but worker labor costs are not the reason our roads cost so much to maintain.

1

koebelin t1_j11s8o7 wrote

I like the unmaintained 60 year old,sidewalks in my neighborhood because they’re half grass now.

2

Clollin OP t1_j121kzs wrote

I see the potential aesthetic appeal, but it also means they might have Ticks in the summer.

1

classicrock40 t1_j0z877y wrote

I understand what you're saying. My take is that our infrastructure was built many years ago. If a town truly wanted to fund all the maintenance projects, it would keep track of the lifetime of each capital item, then assign a lifetime, then add a yearly budget item to save for it. Just like most homeowners don't do this for their roof or furnace or central air, neither do the towns. Priorities shift, tax dollars become scarce and costs rise. Would you rather fund the school budget or maybe let the roads/sidewalks go another year? what about the police/fire/etc Maybe the road/sidewalk is due to be replaced, but its a 25 year plan and the NE weather has destroyed it in 20. Lots of issues, but it always comes down to $ (taxes)

1

Parallax34 t1_j0zfc8z wrote

This is correct but its actually quite a bit more complex than this. MA's CH70, state law around education funding, means a municipality is legaly required to fund schools at an amount determined by a standard equation. And Proposition 2.5 means the municipal levy (overall property taxes) can only grow by 2.5% YOY.

Services, like education costs, consistently grow far faster than 2.5% every year, but really the cost of most municipal services grow more than 2.5%/yr. Some of this can be mitigated with development, as that can add to the tax base further. But the typical effect of these state laws, in lower density suburbs particularly, is that services like roads and infrastructure must be perpetually scaled back over time as the school budget eats up a larger and larger percentage of the overall budget, or in wealthier towns they have periodic override votes, see tax increases, to mitigate this legislative inconsistency.

2

classicrock40 t1_j10ka8o wrote

Agreed. When you live in a small MA town whose income is solely property taxes, whose state contributions keep going down and whose budget is mostly education (regional school district), police and snow plowing it's painfully easy to see.

3

Clollin OP t1_j116gau wrote

I agree. Education, police, and snow plowing seem well funded, but not anything else.

Idk why people prefer seeing a spotless police cruiser to seeing a perfectly even sidewalk.

1

Chippopotanuse t1_j0ze62y wrote

What are you talking about? Which towns?

For instance Natick, Framingham, Wayland and many other metrowest burbs have just had MASSIVE water main/roadway/sidewalk improvements. Like multi-year projects. Huge money spent.

Also, many burbs see shit tons of one-off development from tear-down homes where the builder is going to cut into the roadway to increase the size or replace the service to the houses for water or gas. That leads to asphalt patches that can look like shit over time until the roadway is resurfaced.

All those big box stores in the burbs? They are filled up by huge trucks that do a number on the roadways.

Any town that has permanently crappy main roads is likely doing poorly in terms of real estate tax revenue/income per capita. That’s not a suburb/city thing, it’s an income thing. And if you want to see some janky-ass sidewalks…go wander around Harvard and Back Bay/Beacon hill. There are some brick sidewalks that are so root-heaved in those neighborhoods they are nearly un-walkable.

I think you might be familiar with a struggling town you frequent or live in and thinking all suburbs look like that. They don’t. And not all sidewalks in Boston are 10/10. (Beyond the brick sidewalks that are lumpy as shot…go Google the number of gas main leaks under sidewalks as well as the electrified manhole covers that kill dogs in the city).

1

Clollin OP t1_j116zdh wrote

Ironically, I actually like brick sidewalks. I agree tho that they, if in bad condition, can be worse than concrete for people with significant movement impairments, though.

2

theindecisivehuman t1_j11i9zl wrote

I live in a suburb near the NH boarder and they’re putting in sidewalks for the first time in my neighborhood!

1

Current-Photo2857 t1_j0xm0jv wrote

Here’s a theory, but it certainly doesn’t apply to all suburbs: If you’re in a suburb where everything is spread out, what’s even the point of sidewalks? Where I live, nothing is in walking distance, except neighbors’ homes. At minimum, you’d have to take a bicycle to get somewhere in a reasonable amount of time, but for most things (work, grocery shopping) you need a car. Sidewalks would only be for recreational walking (like for fun or exercise). And if I’m walking for fun, I’ll probably go to some place scenic like the park or the trails, rather than strolling by people’s houses.

0

Clollin OP t1_j0xytv8 wrote

Good point, but some of us don't like to drive before we go for a walk or run. And I'd much rather look at houses than at woods.

1

bubalusarnee t1_j0yek9k wrote

>Good point, but some of us don't like to drive before we go for a walk or run.

It's good when some of us realize life is not a Burger King and we don't always get it just our way.

Sounds like you don't like where you live.

Rather than expecting everyone else AND the buildings to change to suit, maybe you should be somewhere with roads and buildings you like, arranged as you prefer?

Not being mean, just, maybe you should live somewhere else?

3

Clollin OP t1_j1injx3 wrote

Due to my fixation on sidewalks, I drove discussion in this thread away from my main point, which was whether suburbs are in state leadership's view of the future, or only Boston (and maybe Worcester, etc).

However, I just came back from my walk, and I don't see your point. I lived in Mukilteo, WA which has perfect sidewalks everywhere. I prefer it here. However, the only downside is the god-awful sidewalks. However, we know how to make nice sidewalks. Just look at Mukilteo. Even here, suburban strip malls have flawless concrete sidewalks. So it's not impossible in Massachusetts. We just need to do it.

I'd make like a resourceful Ukrainian and learn to re-pave the road myself*, but that's against the law.

*(Ukrainian television put out a video about how Russians, which I am ethnically, just complain about their built environment while Ukrainians go and fix it themselves. I'd love to be like a Ukrainian in that regard if the laws allowed, but at this point in MA I'd just get arrested probably.)

1

Current-Photo2857 t1_j0xzbi6 wrote

And that falls under the “To each his own” category, people like me hate walking by houses, especially if you’re outside your normal neighborhood/route, if you’re among strangers it’s like you’re an intruder. I’d much rather be out in nature…which leads to another point about sidewalks. Depending on what suburb you’re taking about, many areas don’t have sidewalks because the houses are sooooo spread out with plenty of trees and other nature between them.

0

MentallyMusing t1_j0y5duq wrote

I live in Quincy and the sidewalks are in terrible condition to the point I couldn't imagine trying to get around using them with any type of mobility issues. Lots of poorly planned tree planting has left the often narrow sidewalk with the roots making all kinds of hazards with the cement being pushed up in some places close to six inches above the flat before and after with huge cracks making it impossible for an elderly person or someone with a walker, crutches or a scooter or even baby carriage to get over safely and it is absolutely a citywide problem once you leave Hancock St and travel down any side street into a neighborhood. I also can't figure out how the ramps with circle bumps don't cause more problems than they cure in addition to the Horrific inconsistency of the timing and sounds of the pedestrian lights that are in and around Quincy Center which have zero consistency from block to block some even having signage instructing you to press the button and wait for the cars to stop while using sounds that a visually impaired person would Easily mistake as the ok to cross and there is ONLY a blinking light present that Never gives a pedestrian light with some like the intersection at Burgin Parkway where Star Market is heading twords Hancock St that has a pedestrian light that once you hit the median/2 lanes going across the 4 lane road traffic gets a green light arrow pointing them right into the crosswalk and the do not walk like doesn't even have the timer. It literally sets people up to get run over/sets driver's up to hit pedestrians and if it's raining there's even More of a chance of them not expecting a pedestrian to be there. They also put a SUPER dangerous New crosswalks just past it that has only a blinking light and signage saying to yield to pedestrians.

This city has been designed to trap people inside their homes in a very real way with zero options for being outdoors without it being a drive or walk into a restaurant. I grew up here and it is such a disappointment to have things this way. The intersection you have to get through to visit the police station is an absolute death trap as well and I tried crossing it with my then 5yr old and we got stuck having to push the button for the pedestrian light at every island going from the cemetery (that has a yeild to traffic right turn with No light) to get to McDonald's.... It was infuriating how long it took us to safely cross that little section to get to the button for the pedestrian light. I'm thinking the whole time between the lack of public restrooms (plus having to be a customer to use one elsewhere) and the pedestrian lights being so terrible.... I'm going to be stuck showing him how to jaywalk and keep a poncho with me so he can piss outside and still learn he'll get a sex offender rap if he ever gets caught taking a leak outside by the time he's 12 because he's gonna be one of those big kids who looks older than he is. Grrrrr

−1

Clollin OP t1_j115hhy wrote

Not sure why you got downvoted. I think most of what you said is spot-on.

2

MentallyMusing t1_j118cey wrote

Thanks! People don't like the idea of fixers and that's what I chalk it up to. It super easy in the grand scheme of things to train RotBots to ratchet up and down votes.... It's sorta basic "Oh look what we can write code to accomplish" from day one. It's pretty disturbing it's not allowed as part of the discussion regarding the online experience since it's advanced to where it is today and the types of things you can push out from your own personal device to the interwebs/internet. Lots of scripted personas posting and posing as one of us instead of sent by one of us at the last point before it was unleashed

0

October7_7 t1_j1057ih wrote

Ugh god more armchair urbanists

−1