Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Unique-Public-8594 t1_ivpmn65 wrote

Right. I just think there is some truth to the idea that Nader cost Gore the election.

2

leilahamaya t1_ivpo1qq wrote

oooo that one. i was in the camp wrongly blamed for bush, having for voted for Winona LaDuke and that guy she ran with !

but again, voting in deep blue states, it really didnt matter one bit in actuality that gore lost my vote. the state wouldve gone to gore, even though i really disliked him and could not bring myself to vote for him. what a mess. but there was a big misconception there for those of us in deep blue states. i can see how that couldve been a factor in that mess, but idk. it couldve been more independents choosing between no one and nadar, not gore and nadar --or rather winona laduke -- even though it may have been a strange choice for him to have her as running mate, in all truthfullness i voted for her not him. he wasnt bad either, but that is why i voted AT ALL in that particular election.

so my choice in that one was actually LaDuke or NO ONE.

2

leilahamaya t1_ivpoge9 wrote

i would actually love if they put that on all ballots -- no one -- or worded better. where you are specifically voting against BOTH PEOPLE. so not just abstain, but you want to register a negative vote for both parties. and then to see if actually there would be some elections where no one actually won over both choices.

1