Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

ajuice01 t1_iturwn0 wrote

Reply to comment by AccomplishedGrab6415 in There is no compromise with election deniers. And that’s the problem. by Sinman1982

Wasn’t it proven that Hillary had people fabricate that evidence?

−1

AccomplishedGrab6415 t1_ituuyp2 wrote

If you're referring to Durham, everything he's put forth has been repeatedly shown to be bullshit.

2

AccomplishedGrab6415 t1_ituu2zj wrote

If this is the case, it's news to me. Please cite a credible source for this.

1

ajuice01 t1_itv8268 wrote

What about your credible source for proven Russian interference?

−1

AccomplishedGrab6415 t1_itvckgp wrote

LMFAO. Another MAGAt/conservative/liberatarian/CT/trump apologist fanboi.

Anyone: States a widely accepted truth and fact

You: States wild contradiction to said fact.

Anyone: Prove your contradiction.

You: No, you prove your already proven and widely accepted fact.

But I'll play along. Here's 5 sources for you. Now pony up.

https://www.fbi.gov/wanted/cyber/russian-interference-in-2016-u-s-elections

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-russia-senate-findings-fact/factbox-key-findings-from-senate-inquiry-into-russian-interference-in-2016-u-s-election-idUSKCN25E2OY

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/new-evidence-shows-how-russias-election-interference-has-gotten-more

https://apnews.com/article/d094918c0421b872eac7dc4b16e613c7

https://www.justice.gov/archives/sco/file/1373816/download

3