SouthShoreSerenade t1_iuay7ve wrote
Reply to comment by petepont in The face of opposition to Question 1 admits proposed tax wouldn’t hurt him much: ‘I’m not struggling’ - The Boston Globe by petepont
>“Don’t portray me like I’m a friggin’ crybaby because I don’t want to spend 40 grand on a million dollars,”
If you don't want to be called a clown, don't wear a rainbow wig, a big red nose, long squeaky shoes, and facepaint.
bubalusarnee t1_iuck7ik wrote
if one does not like fleas, one should not lay with dogs.
LetsPlayCanasta t1_iub40di wrote
Here we go: it's always necessary to belittle and dehumanize these rich cranberry farmers since it makes it easy to rationalize why they should pay more taxes and not you.
SouthShoreSerenade t1_iub43h9 wrote
Lick that boot! Lick that boot! Lick that boot!
[deleted] t1_iucvgif wrote
[deleted]
modernhomeowner t1_iub66ou wrote
The difference is this cranberry farmer did his own work, made his own opportunity for success. Nothing says boot licker more than someone who has to punch the time clock at a business that was someone else's opportunity.
socialist_frzn_milk t1_iubgxvt wrote
…no he didn’t.
LetsPlayCanasta t1_iub71sl wrote
Yeah, I'm so sick of these high and mighty [checks notes] cranberry farmers.
Ok_Wealth_7711 t1_iubkr5h wrote
The rich are the rich, regardless of your personal perception of their industry.
Having worked as a farmhand, I can confidently say any "farmer" who is making over a million per year is not a farmer themself.
[deleted] t1_iud929q wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments