Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Hoosac_Love t1_j6wfa96 wrote

I respect Worcester and I as a kid saw the old Worcester Counts at the old Worcester centrum.But it's better the the region to make Boston as big a possible.Boston is a tiny 49 Sq. miles,New York is 250 Sq miles and LA is 450 Sq miles.If Boston was 300 square miles it would for sure in the top 5 biggest cities in the US.

5

Adorable_List3836 t1_j6wghgy wrote

No, we should keep Boston in its 49 square miles

5

Hoosac_Love t1_j6wgwu1 wrote

I'm not saying make metro Boston ,Boston proper,only saying a bigger metro Boston is better for the region.

2

AnyRound5042 t1_j6x4zw4 wrote

Only if it comes with requisite public transit

7

Hoosac_Love t1_j6x7lrh wrote

Is PT that bad a bit west of Boston,we have good buses in North Adams with even service to Pittsfield a few times a day

0

AnyRound5042 t1_j6xo0e2 wrote

We're talking about what's already an area covering over 4 million people. If you want to grow that, with Boston serving as a hub, imagine the traffic with 6 or 8 million people all trying to drive into then out of the city at the same time every day. Let alone getting to the other places without a car

1

[deleted] t1_j6y4xgp wrote

Imagine 8 million people taking the Green Line everyday.

1

AnyRound5042 t1_j6yjr6n wrote

It already feels that way most of the time. I used to work nights and trying to get home at the same time all the kids were going to school in the morning was my own little personal hell

2

Hoosac_Love t1_j6xukjh wrote

I was talking statistics not actually growing the population in real people.Making Boston look bigger on paper is good for New England I was not speaking actual population growth.

0

[deleted] t1_j6y4qrs wrote

Boston wouldn’t be Boston if it was not tiny, overcrowded, hard to navigate, expensive and parochial. Making the MSA larger would take away its charm and uniqueness.

2

Hoosac_Love t1_j6y5ddv wrote

I was talking statistics not actual population change

1